Protein isolates from dehulled defatted solojo cowpea seeds were prepared using isoelectric (CPIA) procedure. Two varieties of cowpea, Dark-Ash Solojo (DAS) and Brown Solojo (BS) were cleaned and divided into six portions. Both varieties of cowpea (DAS and BS) investigated were soaked in distilled water and germinated at varying periods i.e. 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72hrs. Protein isolates were obtained from the treated and processed samples by isoelectric precipitation method which was subsequently followed by proximate and anti-nutritional analyses. Functional properties were also analysed which include Water Absorption Capacity (WAC) and Oil Absorption Capacity (OAC) of the protein isolates using standard methods. Amino acids and molecular weight of the protein isolates were determined by amino acid analyser and sodium-dodecyl-sulphate-polyacrylamide-gel-electrophoresis. Surface morphology, functional group and thermal properties were determined for protein isolates by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. Data were analysed using design expert software and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out at α0.05. The moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and total ash of DAS ranged from 9.00-11.40, 24.82-31.00, 1.56-2.66, 1.43-1.67, and 3.20-4.14%, respectively; while those of BS flours ranged from 7.10-9.50, 24.90-30.14, 1.17-2.37, 1.06-1.52 and 3.05-3.93%, respectively. The protein contents for DAS were 81.57±0.53, 86.44±0.84, 89.39±1.51, 90.23±0.53, 91.81±0.77 and 94.85±0.86, while for BS were 84.39±0.39, 85.44±0.56, 90.05±0.10, 90.47±0.89, 92.78±0.28 and 95.81±0.19% for 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hrs, respectively.
Published in | World Journal of Food Science and Technology (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12 |
Page(s) | 25-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Solojo Cowpea, Underutilised Legumes, Protein Isolate, Antinutrients Properties, DAS, BS
[1] | Ali, N A., Ahmed, S H., Mohamed, E A., Ahmed, I. A. M and Babiker, E E. 2010. Changes in functional properties by transglutaminase cross linking as a function of pH of legumes protein isolate. Innovative Romanian Food Biotechnology. 7, 12-20. |
[2] | Salma H. Ahmed, Isam A. Mohamed Ahmed, Mohamed M. Eltayeb, Suha O. Ahmed, Elfadil. E. Babiker, 2011. |
[3] | Aiking, H. 2011. Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 22, 112-120. |
[4] | Jahreis G., Brese M., Leiterer M., Schafer U., Bohm V. 2016. Legume flours: Nutritionally important sources of protein and dietary fiber. Ernahrungs Umschau 63 (02): 36-42. |
[5] | Skylas, D. J., Molloy, M. P., Willows, R. D., Blanchard, C. L. and Quail, K. J. 2017. Characterisation of Protein Isolates Prepared from Processed Mungbean (Vigna radiata) Flours. Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 9, No. 12. |
[6] | Oreopoulou, V. and Tzia, C. 2007. Utilization of plant byproducts for the recovery of proteins, dietary fibers, antioxidants, and colorants. In Utilization of byproducts and treatment of waste in the food industry. Springer US. pp. 209-232. |
[7] | Sibt-e-Abbas, M., Butt, M. S., Sultan, M. T., Sharif, M. K., Ahmad, A. N. and Batool, R. 2015. Nutritional and functional properties of protein isolates extracted from defatted peanut flour, International Food Research Journal 22 (4): 1533-1537. |
[8] | Singhal, A., Can Karaca, A., Tyler, R. and Nickerson, M. 2016. Pulse Proteins: From Processing to Structure-Function Relationships. |
[9] | Klupšaitė, D. Juodeikienė, G. 2015. Legume: Composition, Protein Extraction and Functional Properties. A review. ISSN 1392 – 1231. Cheminė Technologija. Nutrition. 1 (66). |
[10] | Aletor, O. and Ojelabi, A. 2007. Comparative Evaluation of the Nutritive and Functional Attributes of Some Traditional Nigerian Snacks and Oil Seed Cakes. Parkistan Journal of Nutrition. 6 (1): 99–103. |
[11] | Mune, M. A. M., Minka, S. R. and Mbome. I. L. 2013. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of a cowpea protein concentrate Global Advanced Research. Journal of Food Science and Technology: 2 (3) pp. 035-043. |
[12] | Mudryj, A. N., Yu, N. and Aukema, H. M. 2014. Nutritional and health benefits of pulses. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism. 39: 1197–1204. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0557. |
[13] | Mohammad Aghajanpour, Mohamad Reza Nazer, Zia Obeidavi, Mohsen Akbari, Parya Ezati, Nasroallah Moradi Kor (2017), “Functional foods and their role in cancer prevention and health promotion: a comprehensive review”, Am J Cancer Res.; 7 (4): 740-769. |
[14] | Shimelis, E. A., and Rakshit, S. K. 2007. Effect of processing on antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in East Africa. Food Chemistry, 103 (1), 161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.005. |
[15] | Mirmoghtadaie, L. Shojaee, S., Seyede, A. and Hosseini, M. 2016. Recent approaches in physical modification of protein functionality. Food Chemistry, 199: 619-627. |
[16] | Marco-moles, R., Hernando, I., Perez- Munuera, I. 2012. Influence of high-pressure homogenization (HPH) on the structural stability of an egg/dairy emulsion. Journal of Food Engineering. 109 (4) 652-658. |
[17] | D’Astolfo, D. S., Pagliero, R. J., Pras, A., Karthaus, W. R., Clevers, H., Prasad, V. and Geijsen, N. 2015. Efficient Intracellular Delivery of Native Proteins. Cell, 161 (3), 674–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.028. |
[18] | Alashi, A., Blanchard, C. Mailer, R. and Agboola S. 2011. Improving the emulsifying properties of canola meal protein isolate by enzymatic modification 17th Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas (ARAB) Wagga Wagga. |
[19] | Lawal O. S. and Adebowale K. O. 2006. The acylated protein derivatives of Canavalis ensiformis (Jack bean). A study of functional characteristics. Food Technology 39: 918-929. |
[20] | MacDonald, J. I., Munch, H. K., Moore, T., and Francis, M. B. 2015. One-step site-specific modification of native proteins with 2-pyridinecarboxyaldehydes. Nature Chemical Biology, 11 (5), 326–331. |
[21] | Salma, H. A., Nahid, A. A., ElShazali, A. M., Isam, A. M. A. and Elfadil, E. B. 2010. Changes in the functional properties as a function of NaCl concentration of legumes protein isolate by transglutaminase cross linking. International Food Research Journal. 17: 817–824. |
[22] | Barac, M., Cabrilo, S., Pesic, M., Pavlicevic, M., Macej, O. and Ristic, N. 2011. Functional Properties of Pea (Pisum sativum, L.) Protein Isolates Modified with Chyosin. International Journal of Molecular sciences (12) 8372-8387. |
[23] | Zang, X., Yue, C., Wang, Y., Shao, M., and Yu, G. 2018. Effect of limited enzymatic hydrolysis on the structure and emulsifying properties of rice bran protein. Journal of Cereal Science. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.09.001. |
[24] | Wouters, A. G. B., Rombouts, I., Fierens, E., Brijs, K. and Delcour, J. A. 2016. Relevance of the Functional Properties of Enzymatic Plant Protein Hydrolysates in Food Systems. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15 (4) 786-800. |
[25] | Sosulski FW, Kasirye-Alemu EN, Sumner AK (1987) Microscopic, nutritional and functional properties of cowpea flours and protein concentrates during storage. J Food Sci 52: 700-706. |
[26] | Gaspar, A. L. C., and de Góes-Favoni, S. P. 2015. Action of microbial transglutaminase (MTGase) in the modification of food proteins: A Review. Food Chemistry, 171, 315–322. |
[27] | Nahid, A. A., Salma H. A., ElShazali, A. M. and Elfadil, E. B. 2010. Transglutaminase cross-link of legumes protein isolate: changes in functional properties as a function of pH. International Food Research Journal 17: 1011-1018 (2010). |
[28] | Abdalla MH, Elkhalifa AO, Eltinay AH, (2001),” Functional Properties of Cowpea (Vigna Ungiculata L. Walp), and Lupin”. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 3: 6. |
[29] | Chinma C. E, Emelife I. G, and Alemede I. C (2008),” Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Some Nigerian Cowpea Varieties”. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7 (1) DOI:10.3923/pjn.2008.186.190. |
[30] | Rumiyati Rumiyati (2012), “Effect of Germination on the Nutritional and Protein Profile of Australian Sweet Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)”, Food and Nutrition Sciences 03 (05): 621-626. |
[31] | Myrene D’souza (2013),” Effects of traditional processing methods on nutritional quality of Field bean”. Advances in Bioresearch 4 (3): 29. |
[32] | Kavitha Sampathand and Ramanathan Parimalavalli (2014),” Effect of processing methods on proximate composition of cereal and legume flours”. Journal of Human Nutrition & Food Science. 2 (4): 1051. |
[33] | Archana Devi; Manoranjan Kalia; Gupta, V. K.; Katoch, B. S., 1997. Effect of feeding different levels of khesari (Lathyrus sativus) and vetch (Vicia sativa) proteins on the performance of starter chicks. Indian J. Nutr. Diet., 34 (2): 49-58. |
[34] | Ge Zhang, Zhicun Xu, Yuanyuan Gao, Xianxiao Huang, Yanping Zou and Tiankui Yang (2015),” Effects of Germination on the Nutritional Properties, Phenolic Profiles, and Antioxidant Activities of Buckwheat”. A Publication of the Institute of Food Technologists. Volume 80, Issue 5. Pages H1111-H1119. |
[35] | T. A. El-Adawy, E. H. Rahma, A. A. El-Bedawey & A. E. El-Beltagy (2003),”Nutritional potential and functional properties of germinated mung bean, pea and lentil seeds”. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition volume 58, pages 1–13. |
[36] | Dipika Murugkar and Krishna Jha (2013),” Effect of drying on nutritional and functional quality and electrophoretic pattern of soyflour from sprouted soybean (Glycine max)” Journal of Food Science and Technology -Mysore- 47 (5): 482-7. |
[37] | Agugo U. A., Asinobi C. O., and Afam-Anene C. {2016),” Investigating the nutritional, sensory and storage qualities of substituted mungbean-garri diets”. Journal of Food Technology and Preservation (2020) Volume 4, Issue 4. |
[38] | Morteza Oghbaei, Jamuna Prakash and Fatih Yildiz, (2016),” Effect of primary processing of cereals and legumes on its nutritional quality: A comprehensive review”. Cogent Food And Agriculture 2 (1): 1-29. |
[39] | Masood Sadiq Butt and Rizwana Batool, (2010), “Nutritional and Functional Properties of Some Promising Legumes Protein Isolates”. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 9 (4). |
[40] | Reihaneh Ahmadzadeh Ghavidel and amuna Prakash, (2007),” The impact of germination and dehulling on nutrients antinutrients in vitro iron and calcium bioavailability and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of some legume seed”. LWT- Food Science and Technology 40 (7): 1292-1299. |
[41] | Chiemela Enyinnaya, Chinma, Olufemi Adewuyi and Joseph ONEH Abu (2009),” Effect of germination on the chemical and pasting properties of flour from brown and yellow varieties of tigernut (Cyperus esculentus)”. Food Research International 42 (8): 1004-1009. |
[42] | Dejene Dida. 2010. Study on the Effect of Traditional Processing on Proximate Composition and Bioavailability of Minerals in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) grown in Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa. 80pp. |
[43] | Ragab DDM, Babiker EE, Eltinay AH (2004) Fractionation, solubility and functional properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) proteins as affected by pH and/or salt concentration. J Food Chem 84: 207-212. |
[44] | Smith G. Nkhata, Emmanuel Ayua, Elijah H. Kamau, and Jean-Bosco Shingiro, (2018), “Fermentation and germination improve nutritional value of cereals and legumes through activation of endogenous enzymes”. Food Sci Nutr. 6 (8): 2446–2458. |
[45] | Beruk Berhanu. 2013. Formulation of Nutritionally Improved Complementary Food: The case of Shebedino Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Hawassa University, Hawassa.110pp. |
[46] | M. R. Megat Rusydi, C. W. Noraliza, Azrina Azlan, Zulkhairi Amom (2011), “Nutritional changes in germinated legumes and rice varieties”, International Food Research Journal 18 (2). |
[47] | Victor Ndigwe Enujiugha, Adebanjo Badejo, Matthew Olusola Oluwamukomi and Samuel O Iyiola (2003),” Effect of germination on the functional properties of African oil bean (Penthaclethra macrophylla Benth) seed flour”. Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol. 1 (3&4): 72-75. 2003. |
[48] | B. M. Warle, Charanjit Singh Riar and Sandeep S. Gaikwad and V. A. Mane (2015), “Effect of Germination on Nutritional Quality of Soybean (Glycine Max)”. International Journal of Current Research 07 (5): 16029-16034. |
APA Style
Olubamike Adetutu Adeyoju, Kayode Oyebode Adebowale, Bamidele Iromidayo Olu-Owolabi, Henry Okwudili Chibudike, Eunice Chinedum Chibudike. (2021). Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Flour and Protein Isolates from Two (2) Solojo Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Varieties in Nigeria. World Journal of Food Science and Technology, 5(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12
ACS Style
Olubamike Adetutu Adeyoju; Kayode Oyebode Adebowale; Bamidele Iromidayo Olu-Owolabi; Henry Okwudili Chibudike; Eunice Chinedum Chibudike. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Flour and Protein Isolates from Two (2) Solojo Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Varieties in Nigeria. World J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 5(2), 25-32. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12
AMA Style
Olubamike Adetutu Adeyoju, Kayode Oyebode Adebowale, Bamidele Iromidayo Olu-Owolabi, Henry Okwudili Chibudike, Eunice Chinedum Chibudike. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Flour and Protein Isolates from Two (2) Solojo Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Varieties in Nigeria. World J Food Sci Technol. 2021;5(2):25-32. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12
@article{10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12, author = {Olubamike Adetutu Adeyoju and Kayode Oyebode Adebowale and Bamidele Iromidayo Olu-Owolabi and Henry Okwudili Chibudike and Eunice Chinedum Chibudike}, title = {Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Flour and Protein Isolates from Two (2) Solojo Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Varieties in Nigeria}, journal = {World Journal of Food Science and Technology}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {25-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjfst.20210502.12}, abstract = {Protein isolates from dehulled defatted solojo cowpea seeds were prepared using isoelectric (CPIA) procedure. Two varieties of cowpea, Dark-Ash Solojo (DAS) and Brown Solojo (BS) were cleaned and divided into six portions. Both varieties of cowpea (DAS and BS) investigated were soaked in distilled water and germinated at varying periods i.e. 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72hrs. Protein isolates were obtained from the treated and processed samples by isoelectric precipitation method which was subsequently followed by proximate and anti-nutritional analyses. Functional properties were also analysed which include Water Absorption Capacity (WAC) and Oil Absorption Capacity (OAC) of the protein isolates using standard methods. Amino acids and molecular weight of the protein isolates were determined by amino acid analyser and sodium-dodecyl-sulphate-polyacrylamide-gel-electrophoresis. Surface morphology, functional group and thermal properties were determined for protein isolates by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. Data were analysed using design expert software and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out at α0.05. The moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and total ash of DAS ranged from 9.00-11.40, 24.82-31.00, 1.56-2.66, 1.43-1.67, and 3.20-4.14%, respectively; while those of BS flours ranged from 7.10-9.50, 24.90-30.14, 1.17-2.37, 1.06-1.52 and 3.05-3.93%, respectively. The protein contents for DAS were 81.57±0.53, 86.44±0.84, 89.39±1.51, 90.23±0.53, 91.81±0.77 and 94.85±0.86, while for BS were 84.39±0.39, 85.44±0.56, 90.05±0.10, 90.47±0.89, 92.78±0.28 and 95.81±0.19% for 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hrs, respectively.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Flour and Protein Isolates from Two (2) Solojo Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Varieties in Nigeria AU - Olubamike Adetutu Adeyoju AU - Kayode Oyebode Adebowale AU - Bamidele Iromidayo Olu-Owolabi AU - Henry Okwudili Chibudike AU - Eunice Chinedum Chibudike Y1 - 2021/06/04 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12 T2 - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Food Science and Technology SP - 25 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6024 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20210502.12 AB - Protein isolates from dehulled defatted solojo cowpea seeds were prepared using isoelectric (CPIA) procedure. Two varieties of cowpea, Dark-Ash Solojo (DAS) and Brown Solojo (BS) were cleaned and divided into six portions. Both varieties of cowpea (DAS and BS) investigated were soaked in distilled water and germinated at varying periods i.e. 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72hrs. Protein isolates were obtained from the treated and processed samples by isoelectric precipitation method which was subsequently followed by proximate and anti-nutritional analyses. Functional properties were also analysed which include Water Absorption Capacity (WAC) and Oil Absorption Capacity (OAC) of the protein isolates using standard methods. Amino acids and molecular weight of the protein isolates were determined by amino acid analyser and sodium-dodecyl-sulphate-polyacrylamide-gel-electrophoresis. Surface morphology, functional group and thermal properties were determined for protein isolates by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. Data were analysed using design expert software and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out at α0.05. The moisture content, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre and total ash of DAS ranged from 9.00-11.40, 24.82-31.00, 1.56-2.66, 1.43-1.67, and 3.20-4.14%, respectively; while those of BS flours ranged from 7.10-9.50, 24.90-30.14, 1.17-2.37, 1.06-1.52 and 3.05-3.93%, respectively. The protein contents for DAS were 81.57±0.53, 86.44±0.84, 89.39±1.51, 90.23±0.53, 91.81±0.77 and 94.85±0.86, while for BS were 84.39±0.39, 85.44±0.56, 90.05±0.10, 90.47±0.89, 92.78±0.28 and 95.81±0.19% for 0, 6, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hrs, respectively. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -