Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria

Received: 3 September 2025     Accepted: 28 September 2025     Published: 27 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Diarrhea remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among children in low-resource settings such as Nigeria. This study assessed the prevalence of childhood diarrhea and caregivers’ knowledge of its management in urban and rural communities of Rivers State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to caregivers. Diarrhea prevalence and knowledge levels were estimated in rural and urban settings. Statistical analyses, such as percentages for prevalence, Chi-square tests for association, and binary logistic regression to identify the predictors of poor knowledge management strategies. All statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Diarrhea prevalence was significantly higher in rural areas (60.7%; 95% CI: 53.1%-67.9%) compared to urban areas (38.8%; 95% CI: 33.0%-45.0%). Knowledge levels also differed markedly: rural caregivers (n = 163) had a mean knowledge score of 10.15 ± 4.402, with 64.4% classified as having poor knowledge, while urban caregivers (n = 250) achieved a higher mean score of 14.92 ± 4.669, with 76.0% demonstrating good knowledge. The difference was statistically significant (t = -7.43, p < 0.001). Urban caregivers had better access to healthcare services, improved water sources, and higher education levels, which contributed to more effective diarrhea management practices, including greater uptake of exclusive breastfeeding (54.8% vs. 28.2% in rural areas). Key predictors of poor knowledge included young age, low income, limited education, lack of exclusive breastfeeding, and use of unimproved water sources. Surprisingly, urban caregivers using improved water sources were more likely to have poor knowledge, possibly due to false perceptions of safety. Significant disparities in diarrhea prevalence and caregiver knowledge exist between urban and rural areas. Targeted health education and improved rural infrastructure are critical to reducing this burden.

Published in World Journal of Public Health (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17
Page(s) 497-511
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Diarrhea Prevalence, Caregiver Knowledge, Rural-Urban Disparities, Child Health, Rivers State, Nigeria

1. Introduction
Childhood diarrhea continues to be a significant public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nigeria. It is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children under five years of age globally, accounting for an estimated 446,000 deaths in 2022 . In Nigeria alone, diarrhea diseases are responsible for approximately 10-15% of under-five deaths annually . These statistics highlight the urgency of addressing the persistent burden of diarrheal illnesses through improved prevention, early recognition, and effective management strategies .
The risk of childhood diarrhea is particularly high in communities with limited access to safe drinking water, poor sanitation, inadequate hygiene practices, and suboptimal health-seeking behaviours . Rural areas are especially vulnerable due to infrastructural and healthcare access limitations. However, densely populated urban slums with poor waste management also experience high rates of diarrheal disease. In Rivers State, located in Nigeria’s Niger Delta region, these environmental and systemic challenges are compounded by pollution, overcrowding, and economic disparities, making both rural and urban children susceptible to recurrent diarrheal episodes .
Despite the availability of simple, effective, and affordable management strategies such as Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT), zinc supplementation, continued breastfeeding, and appropriate fluid intake, diarrhea-related mortality remains high . The World Health Organization recommends the combined use of ORT and zinc for the effective management of acute diarrhea, yet studies have shown that these interventions remain underutilized, particularly in rural communities where caregiver knowledge and access to health education may be limited .
Caregivers play a critical role in the prompt recognition and home-based management of diarrheal diseases. Their knowledge, attitudes, and practices are key determinants of how early and effectively a child receives treatment . Numerous studies have shown a significant association between caregiver education levels, knowledge of diarrhea management, and outcomes in children . However, these knowledge levels often differ significantly between rural and urban populations, influenced by factors such as literacy, media exposure, access to healthcare, cultural beliefs, and economic status .
While some urban caregivers may benefit from higher health literacy and better access to pediatric care, those in rural areas may depend heavily on traditional remedies or delay seeking professional help due to distance, cost, or lack of awareness . This rural-urban disparity in knowledge and management practices has critical implications for childhood health outcomes and health policy planning in Rivers State and Nigeria as a whole. This study, therefore, aims to assess the burden of childhood diarrhea and evaluate the knowledge and management strategies employed by caregivers in both rural and urban areas of Rivers State. The findings will contribute to identifying gaps in awareness and service delivery and guide interventions aimed at reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with childhood diarrhea in the region.
Research Questions
1) What is the prevalence of childhood diarrhea in urban and rural areas in Rivers State?
2) How is the level of knowledge of caregivers on diarrhea and its management in urban and rural areas in Rivers State?
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
This study was conducted across four Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Rivers State, Nigeria. Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor represent urban areas, and Etche and Asari-Toru represent rural areas. A total of eight communities were purposively selected to capture the demographic, cultural, and infrastructural diversity between urban and rural settings. These included Ogbunabali and Rumukalagbor (Port Harcourt), Rumueme and Rukpoku (Obio/Akpor), Okehi and Ndashi (Etche), and Abalama and Tema (Asari-Toru).
Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor are highly urbanized with better access to healthcare, education, and public infrastructure, yet they still exhibit disparities in sanitation and healthcare utilization. In contrast, Etche and Asari-Toru LGAs represent rural and riverine communities with limited access to modern health facilities, greater reliance on traditional health practices, and environmental challenges such as poor water supply and flooding . These differences are essential to understanding how contextual factors influence caregivers' knowledge and practices regarding childhood diarrhea management. This urban-rural comparative framework offers critical insights for tailoring public health interventions across diverse community settings in Rivers State.
2.2. Study Design
This study employed a comparative cross-sectional design to assess differences in diarrhea management practices among caregivers of children in urban and rural areas of Rivers State, Nigeria.
Figure 1. Map of Rivers State Showing the Study Locations.
2.3. Study Population
The study population included caregivers of children under five years old living in selected urban (Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor) and rural (Etche and Asari-Toru) communities across four Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Rivers State. Participants were mothers, fathers, or guardians who held primary responsibility for childcare.
Caregivers were considered eligible for participation if they had primary responsibility for a child under five, had lived in the selected urban or rural communities for at least six months, were able to communicate in English or a local language, and provided informed consent. Conversely, caregivers were excluded if they were not the primary caregiver, such as domestic helpers, if they cared for children with chronic illnesses or disabilities, had lived in the community for less than six months, had communication impairments, or declined to give consent or participated in a similar study within the past six months.
2.4. Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique
The sample size for this comparative study was determined using the standard formula for comparing two independent proportions .
n=(Zα/22P1-P+ZβP11-P1+P21-P2)2(P1-P2)2
The sample size was estimated as 413 based on P1 = 0.40 and P2 = 0.27, for urban and rural settings . Where P is the average of P1 and P2.
The 23 Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Rivers State were clustered into rural and urban settings, and two LGAs were randomly selected from each setting. Obio/Akpor and Port Harcourt for urban, and Etche and Asari-Toru for rural. The participants were proportionally allocated based on household estimates, with 250 respondents selected from urban areas and 163 from rural areas. One ward was randomly selected from each LGA using the lottery method: Rumueme (Obio/Akpor), Ogbunabali (Port Harcourt), Okehi (Etche), and Abalama (Asari-Toru). Two communities were randomly chosen from each selected ward, yielding a total of eight communities. The urban communities included Rumueme and Mgbuoshimiri for Obio/Akpor, and Ogbunabali and Rumukalagbor for Port Harcourt. Similarly, the rural communities were Okehi and Ndashi for Etche, and Abalama and Tema for Asari-Toru. The household was selected using systematic sampling.
2.5. Data Collection Procedure and Instrument
Data for the study were collected from the households of the wards of the selected LGAs from 16th September to 20th October 2024 using a semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire after obtaining informed consent from the participants. The questionnaire, developed from insights obtained through a review of relevant literature, was divided into three sections. Section A captured respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics, Section B assessed their knowledge of diarrhea and its management, while Section C focused on management practices. To minimize misinterpretation of questions and enhance the accuracy of responses, the instrument was administered by trained interviewers. Content and construct validity were ensured through expert review by three public health specialists, and Cronbach’s Alpha (CA) test of reliability was calculated as 0.80.
2.6. Data Analysis
The prevalence of diarrhea in urban and rural areas of Rivers State was estimated using proportions and its 95% confidence intervals. To ascertain the knowledge of caregivers regarding diarrhea and its management, a composite knowledge score was generated from correct responses to structured questions and for multiple response questions, dichotomous variables were created with each option coded as 1 for a correct answer and 0 for a non-correct answer. A total of 27 knowledge items were assessed, with the maximum obtainable score being 27 (100%). Knowledge levels were categorized based on percentage scores using a 50% benchmark, in line with previous studies . Respondents who scored below 50% (0-13 points) were classified as having poor knowledge, while those who scored ≥50% (14-27 points) were categorized as having good knowledge. Descriptive statistics such as mean scores, standard deviations, and frequency distributions were employed to summarize the knowledge levels of caregivers in both settings. A binary logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with poor knowledge. Odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported to quantify the strength of association. The level of statistical significance for all inferential analyses was set at p < 0.05. Results were presented in tables and charts for clarity and easy interpretation in line with the study objectives.
3. Results
3.1. Prevalence of Diarrhea in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State
Results of the prevalence of diarrhea in urban and rural areas are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
The overall prevalence of diarrhea was significantly higher in the rural area (60.7%; 95% CI: 53.1%-67.9%) compared with the urban area (38.8%; 95% CI: 33.0%-45.0%).
Prevalence varied across age groups in both settings. Among caregivers aged 15-25 years, diarrhea prevalence was 77.8% (95% CI: 61.9%-88.3%) in rural compared with 36.4% (95% CI: 22.2%-53.4%) in urban areas. For the 26-35 years’ age group, prevalence was 60.0% (95% CI: 48.3%-70.7%) in rural versus 39.0% (95% CI: 30.9%-47.9%) in urban. Similarly, caregivers above 35 years recorded a higher prevalence in rural (50.9%; 95% CI: 38.3%-63.4%) compared with urban (39.4%; 95% CI: 30.1%-49.5%).
Diarrhea prevalence was consistently higher among those not married, with rural respondents recording 71.8% (95% CI: 58.7%-82.1%) compared to 18.3% (95% CI: 10.4%-30.0%) in urban areas. Among the married, prevalence was also higher in rural (52.2%; 95% CI: 42.1%-62.1%) than in urban (45.0%; 95% CI: 38.1%-52.1%).
Caregivers with below secondary education had a higher prevalence in rural (62.5%; 95% CI: 47.0%-76.0%) compared to urban (34.8%; 95% CI: 17.8%-56.0%). Similarly, among those with secondary and above, rural prevalence (60.2%; 95% CI: 50.9%-69.0%) exceeded urban (39.2%; 95% CI: 32.9%-45.9%).
Unemployed caregivers reported the highest burden of diarrhea in both settings, with rural prevalence of 82.4% (95% CI: 56.6%-94.9%) versus 18.2% (95% CI: 5.2%-47.7%) in urban. Among the self-employed, rural prevalence was 57.8% (95% CI: 47.3%-67.6%), higher than the 40.4% (95% CI: 31.3%-50.2%) observed in urban. Civil/public servants followed the same pattern, with 59.5% (95% CI: 41.5%-75.5%) in rural compared with 39.2% (95% CI: 30.9%-48.1%) in urban areas.
Across all income levels, diarrhea prevalence was higher in rural than in urban areas. Among households earning less than ₦30,000, prevalence was 62.0% (95% CI: 48.7%-73.7%) in rural compared to 35.8% (95% CI: 23.5%-50.4%) in urban. For the ₦30,000-100,000 group, rural prevalence was 50.7% (95% CI: 37.5%-63.8%) versus 35.9% (95% CI: 27.6%-45.2%) in urban. The highest prevalence was observed among caregivers earning above ₦100,000, with 84.0% (95% CI: 63.9%-94.3%) in rural areas compared to 45.0% (95% CI: 34.1%-56.4%) in urban areas.
Households with 1-2 children recorded a prevalence of 58.5% (95% CI: 49.6% - 66.9%) in rural compared to 39.4% (95% CI: 33.0% - 46.1%) in urban areas. For households with 3 or more children, prevalence rose to 71.4% (95% CI: 51.3% - 85.8%) in rural areas, compared with 22.2% (95% CI: 6.3% - 54.7%) in urban.
Diarrhea prevalence was higher among caregivers using improved water sources in rural (65.4%; 95% CI: 54.6%-74.7%) compared to urban (37.9%; 95% CI: 32.0%-44.2%). Interestingly, those relying on unimproved water sources had a prevalence of 51.8% (95% CI: 37.9%-65.5%) in rural and 60.0% (95% CI: 26.2%-85.5%) in urban areas.
Exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a lower prevalence in both settings, but rural figures were still higher. Among those who exclusively breastfed, diarrhea prevalence was 51.1% (95% CI: 35.0%-67.0%) in rural compared with 33.3% (95% CI: 24.8%-43.1%) in urban. Conversely, for those who did not practice exclusive breastfeeding, prevalence was 64.4% (95% CI: 54.5%-73.2%) in rural compared to 43.5% (95% CI: 35.3%-52.1%) in urban.
Table 1. Comparative Prevalence of Diarrhea in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State.

Variable

Urban Prevalence (n=250)

Rural Prevalence (n= 163)

Diarrhea

95% CI for prevalence

Diarrhea

95% CI for Prevalence

No n (%)

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Yes n (%)

Overall

153 (61.2)

97 (38.8)

38.8 (33.0-45.0)

64 (39.3)

99 (60.7)

60.7 (53.1-67.9)

Respondent’s Age

15-25 yrs

21 (63.6)

12 (36.4)

36.4 (22.2-53.4)

8 (22.2)

28 (77.8)

77.8 (61.9-88.3)

26-35 yrs

75 (61.0)

48 (39.0)

39.0 (30.9-47.9)

28 (40.0)

42 (60.0)

60.0 (48.3-70.7)

>35 yrs

57 (60.6)

37 (39.4)

39.4 (30.1-49.5)

28 (49.1)

29 (50.9)

50.9 (38.3-63.4)

Marital Status

Married

104 (55.0)

85 (45.0)

45.0 (38.1-52.1)

44 (47.8)

48 (52.2)

52.2 (42.1-62.1)

Not Married

49 (81.7)

11 (18.3)

18.3 (10.4-30.0)

20 (28.2)

51 (71.8)

71.8 (58.7-82.1)

Highest Education

Below Secondary

15 (65.2)

8 (34.8)

34.8 (17.8-56.0)

15 (37.5)

25 (62.5)

62.5 (47.0-76.0)

Secondary & Above

138 (60.8)

89 (39.2)

39.2 (32.9-45.9)

49 (39.8)

74 (60.2)

60.2 (50.9-69.0)

Occupation

Civil/Public Servant

79 (60.8)

51 (39.2)

39.2 (30.9-48.1)

15 (40.5)

22 (59.5)

59.5 (41.5-75.5)

Self-employed

65 (59.6)

44 (40.4)

40.4 (31.3-50.2)

46 (42.2)

63 (57.8)

57.8 (47.3-67.6)

Unemployed

9 (81.8)

2 (18.2)

18.2 (5.2-47.7)

3 (17.6)

14 (82.4)

82.4 (56.6-94.9)

Monthly Income (₦)

<30,000

34 (64.2)

19 (35.8)

35.8 (23.5-50.4)

27 (38.0)

44 (62.0)

62.0 (48.7-73.7)

30,000-100,000

75 (64.1)

42 (35.9)

35.9 (27.6-45.2)

33 (49.3)

34 (50.7)

50.7 (37.5-63.8)

>100,000

44 (55.0)

36 (45.0)

45.0 (34.1-56.4)

4 (16.0)

21 (84.0)

84.0 (63.9-94.3)

Under-5 Children

1-2

146 (60.6)

95 (39.4)

39.4 (33.0-46.1)

56 (41.5)

79 (58.5)

58.5 (49.6-66.9)

3+

7 (77.8)

2 (22.2)

22.2 (6.3-54.7)

8 (28.6)

20 (71.4)

71.4 (51.3-85.8)

Source of Drinking Water

Improved

149 (62.1)

91 (37.9)

37.9 (32.0-44.2)

37 (34.6)

70 (65.4)

65.4 (54.6-74.7)

Unimproved

4 (40.0)

6 (60.0)

60.0 (26.2-85.5)

27 (48.2)

29 (51.8)

51.8 (37.9-65.5)

Exclusive Breastfeeding

Yes

74 (66.7)

37 (33.3)

33.3 (24.8-43.1)

22 (48.9)

23 (51.1)

51.1 (35.0-67.0)

No

78 (56.5)

60 (43.5)

43.5 (35.3-52.1)

42 (35.6)

76 (64.4)

64.4 (54.5-73.2)

3.2. Knowledge Level of Caregivers on Diarrhea and Its Management in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State
Table 2 shows the distribution of caregivers’ knowledge of diarrhea and its management across urban (n = 250) and rural (n = 163) areas of Rivers State. The findings reveal clear disparities between the two groups.
Overall, 180 (72.0%) of urban caregivers had heard about diarrhea compared to 89 (54.6%) of rural caregivers, while 70 (28.0%) urban and 74 (45.4%) rural caregivers reported never having heard of it.
When asked to define diarrhea, 160 (64.0%) urban caregivers and 90 (55.2%) rural caregivers correctly identified it as the passage of three or more loose stools per day. Incorrect definitions such as passage of one loose stool per day were reported by 20 (8.0%) urban and 15 (9.2%) rural caregivers, while 20 (8.0%) urban and 10 (6.1%) rural caregivers described it as inability to stool. A notable proportion of respondents had no idea: 50 (20.0%) urban and 48 (29.4%) rural caregivers.
With regard to symptoms of diarrhea, the most commonly cited was “three or more loose stools with blood,” reported by 130 (52.0%) urban and 85 (52.1%) rural caregivers. Other symptoms mentioned included fever and weakness (90; 36.0% urban vs. 70; 42.9% rural) and repeated vomiting (60; 24.0% urban vs. 45; 27.6% rural). However, 50 (20.0%) urban and 48 (29.4%) rural caregivers could not identify any symptom.
On the age when diarrhea is most dangerous, 120 (48.0%) urban and 95 (58.3%) rural caregivers correctly identified infants (0-1 year), while 100 (40.0%) urban and 60 (36.8%) rural caregivers mentioned under-fives (0-4 years). Misconceptions were also observed, with 20 (8.0%) urban and 5 (3.1%) rural caregivers incorrectly identifying adolescents (10-19 years) as the most vulnerable.
Knowledge of ORS (Oral Rehydration Solution) and salt-sugar solution was higher among urban caregivers (168; 67.2%) compared to rural caregivers (92; 56.4%). Among those familiar with ORS, 140 (56.0%) urban and 85 (52.1%) rural caregivers correctly identified its use in the treatment of diarrhea. Misconceptions were more frequent in rural areas, where 15 (9.2%) thought it was for cough and 5 (3.1%) for diabetes, compared to 20 (8.0%) and 10 (4.0%) in urban areas, respectively. Notably, 80 (32.0%) urban and 58 (35.6%) rural caregivers still did not know the use of ORS.
Regarding preventive and management strategies, correct practices were more commonly cited in urban areas. These included exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months (70; 28.0% urban vs. 33; 20.2% rural), handwashing with soap (162; 64.8% urban vs. 94; 57.7% rural), vitamin A supplementation (80; 32.0% urban vs. 45; 27.6% rural), improved water supply and sanitation (95; 38.0% urban vs. 52; 31.9% rural), and use of ORS and salt-sugar solution (168; 67.2% urban vs. 92; 56.4% rural). However, 40 (16.0%) urban and 35 (21.5%) rural caregivers reported not knowing any preventive measures.
On whether prompt and effective management of diarrhea is beneficial, 200 (80.0%) urban and 120 (73.6%) rural caregivers agreed. However, more rural respondents disagreed (28; 17.2%) compared to urban (25; 10.0%). About 25 (10.0%) urban and 15 (9.2%) rural caregivers stated they did not know.
Table 2. Knowledge Levels of Diarrhea and its Management among Caregivers in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State (N = 413).

Variables

Urban (N = 250)

Rural (N = 163)

n (%)

n (%)

Heard about diarrhea

Yes

180 (72.0)

89 (54.6)

No

70 (28.0)

74 (45.4)

Definition of diarrhea

Passage of three or more loose stools per day

160 (64.0)

90 (55.2)

Passage of one loose stool per day

20 (8.0)

15 (9.2)

Inability to stool

20 (8.0)

10 (6.1)

I don’t know

50 (20.0)

48 (29.4)

Symptoms of diarrhea

Three or more loose stools with blood

130 (52.0)

85 (52.1)

Fever and weakness

90 (36.0)

70 (42.9)

Repeated vomiting

60 (24.0)

45 (27.6)

I don’t know

50 (20.0)

48 (29.4)

Age when diarrhea is most dangerous

Infant (0 - 1 year)

120 (48.0)

95 (58.3)

Under-5 (0 - 4 years)

100 (40.0)

60 (36.8)

Adolescent (10 - 19 years)

20 (8.0)

5 (3.1)

I don’t know

10 (4.0)

3 (1.8)

Do you know the Meaning of ORS and salt-sugar solution

Yes

168 (67.2)

92 (56.4)

No

82 (32.8)

71 (43.6)

If yes, what are they used for?

Management/treatment of diarrhea

140 (56.0)

85 (52.1)

Management/treatment of cough

20 (8.0)

15 (9.2)

Management/treatment of diabetes

10 (4.0)

5 (3.1)

I don’t know

80 (32.0)

58 (35.6)

Methods to prevent and manage Diarrhea

Exclusive breastfeeding (≥6 months)

70 (28.0)

33 (20.2)

Hand-washing with soap

162 (64.8)

94 (57.7)

Vitamin A supplementation

80 (32.0)

45 (27.6)

Improved water supply and sanitation

95 (38.0)

52 (31.9)

Use of ORS and salt-sugar solution

168 (67.2)

92 (56.4)

I don’t know

40 (16.0)

35 (21.5)

Prompt and effective management is Beneficial

Yes

200 (80.0)

120 (73.6)

No

25 (10.0)

28 (17.2)

I don’t know

25 (10.0)

15 (9.2)

Knowledge level

Poor knowledge

24.0%

64.4%

Good knowledge

76.0%

35.6%

3.3. Knowledge Level on Diarrhea and Its Management in Urban and Rural Areas in Rivers State
The comparative analysis presents a comparative analysis of the number of knowledge questions, score ranges, mean scores, and categorized knowledge levels on diarrhea and its management between rural and urban caregivers in Rivers State. Knowledge was assessed with 27 questions, yielding possible scores between 0 and 27. The results show that rural caregivers (n = 163) had a mean knowledge score of 10.15 ± 4.402, while urban caregivers (n = 250) recorded a higher mean score of 14.92 ± 4.669. This difference indicates that caregivers in urban settings generally demonstrated a stronger understanding of diarrhea and its management than those in rural areas. When knowledge levels were categorized into good and poor, clear disparities emerged. Among rural respondents, 105 caregivers (64.4%) had poor knowledge, while only 58 (35.6%) demonstrated good knowledge. Conversely, in urban areas, 190 caregivers (76.0%) had good knowledge, compared to 60 (24.0%) with poor knowledge.
Statistical analysis using an independent samples T-test yielded a value of -7.43, with a corresponding p-value of 3.12e-12 (<0.001). This confirms that the observed difference in mean knowledge scores between rural and urban caregivers is highly significant and not due to chance.
Table 3. Number of questions, Scores, and Knowledge level on diarrhea and its management in Urban and Rural Areas in Rivers State.

Knowledge

Rural (n=163)

Urban (n=250)

T-test

P-value

Number of Questions

Range of Scores

Total Scores Mean ± SD

Poor Level (%)

Good level (%)

Total Score Mean ± SD

Poor Level (%)

Good Level (%)

-7.43

3.12e-12

27

0-27

10.15±4.402

105 (64.4%)

58 (35.6%)

14.92±4.669

60 (24.0%)

190 (76.0%)

3.4. Caregivers' Sources of Information on Diarrhea and Its Management in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State
The comparison of Caregivers' Sources of Information on diarrhea and Its Management in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State is shown in Figure 2 below.
Health facilities are the most common source in urban areas (48.0%) compared to rural areas (36.2%). Family and friends are the dominant source in rural areas (49.7%) compared to urban areas (35.6%). Media contributes slightly more to the urban populations (10.4%) than rural populations (8.6%). Reading Instruction is minimally used in both settings, with slightly higher use in urban areas (3.6%) than rural areas (2.5%). Other sources contribute marginally, with rural areas (3.1%) slightly exceeding urban areas (2.4%).
Figure 2. Caregivers Sources of Information on Diarrhea and its Management.
3.5. Perceived Causes of Diarrhea in Rural and Urban Areas in Rivers State
The comparison of the perceived causes of diarrhea between urban and rural populations in Rivers State is shown in Figure 3. It categorizes the causes into five groups: Drinking unclean water, eating unclean and infested food, Poor hygiene practice by caregiver, Teething of the child, and I don’t know. Drinking unclean water is the most cited cause in urban areas (63.2%) but significantly lower in rural areas (8.0%). Eating unclean and infested food is more recognized in rural areas (29.4%) than urban areas (19.2%). Poor hygiene practice by caregivers is also a notable concern in rural areas (20.2%) compared to urban areas (11.6%). Teething of the child is a major perceived cause in rural areas (34.4%) but much lower in urban areas (4.0%), reflecting traditional beliefs. I don’t know responses are slightly higher in rural areas (8.0%) than in urban areas (2.0%).
Figure 3. Caregivers Perceived Causes of diarrhea in Rural and Urban area in Rivers State.
3.6. Factors Associated with Poor Knowledge of Caregivers on Diarrhea and Its Management
The tables present the logistic regression analyses examining the sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with poor caregiver knowledge of diarrhea and its management in rural and urban areas of Rivers State. While some predictors were consistent across both settings, notable contextual differences were observed.
In rural areas, younger caregivers (15-25 years) initially appeared less likely to exhibit poor knowledge in the bivariate analysis (COR = 0.091, p < 0.001), but this association was not significant after adjustment (AOR = 0.457, p = 0.307). Similarly, marital status showed a significant crude association (COR = 3.750, p < 0.001), which disappeared in the multivariable model (AOR = 1.962, p = 0.122), suggesting it is not an independent predictor of knowledge. Educational attainment, however, demonstrated a stronger influence in rural settings. Caregivers with below-secondary education had significantly higher odds of poor knowledge at the bivariate level (COR = 0.188, p < 0.001), though the association weakened after adjustment (AOR = 0.363, p = 0.076).
In urban areas, education level did not significantly predict knowledge at either the crude or adjusted level (AOR = 0.670, p = 0.506). Occupational status was also not independently associated with caregiver knowledge in either setting. Although rural self-employed caregivers showed lower odds of poor knowledge in the crude model (COR = 0.385, p < 0.001), the relationship lost significance after adjustment (AOR = 0.902, p = 0.859). Similar patterns were observed among civil/public servants in both rural and urban areas.
Monthly income emerged as a consistent and significant determinant of knowledge across both settings. In rural areas, caregivers earning less than ₦30,000 per month had significantly higher odds of poor knowledge at both crude (COR = 0.164, p < 0.001) and adjusted levels (AOR = 0.194, p = 0.009). Likewise, in urban areas, low income was also an independent predictor of poor knowledge (AOR = 0.159, p = 0.002), underscoring the impact of economic barriers on health awareness.
Household size, defined by the number of children, was significantly associated with knowledge in rural areas. Caregivers in households with 1-2 children had better knowledge outcomes (AOR = 0.283, p = 0.019). However, no significant association was found in urban settings (AOR = 0.650, p = 0.642).
Water source quality did not significantly influence knowledge in rural areas. However, in urban settings, caregivers relying on improved water sources were paradoxically more likely to have poor knowledge (AOR = 7.948, p = 0.009). This unexpected finding may reflect a false sense of security and reduced engagement with health education messages.
Exclusive breastfeeding showed contrasting effects across settings. In urban areas, caregivers who practiced exclusive breastfeeding had significantly lower odds of poor knowledge in both crude (COR = 11.545, p < 0.001) and adjusted models (AOR = 7.484, p < 0.001). Although a similar protective trend was observed in rural areas, the association was not statistically significant after adjustment (AOR = 2.161, p = 0.090). See Tables 4 and 5 below.
Table 4. Factors Associated with Poor Knowledge of Caregivers on Diarrhea and Its Management in Rural Areas.

Variable

COR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

p-value

Respondent's Age

15-25 years

0.091 (0.028 - 0.296)

0.000

0.457 (0.102 - 2.055)

0.307

25- 35 years

0.865 (0.539 - 1.388)

0.548

2.427 (0.980 - 6.006)

0.055

>35 years

Reference

-

Reference

-

Marital Status

Currently married

3.750 (2.646 - 5.315)

0.000

1.962 (0.835 - 4.611)

0.122

Not Married

Education Level

Below secondary

0.188 (0.078 - 0.448)

0.000

0.363 (0.118 - 1.110)

0.076

Secondary and above

Reference

-

Reference

-

Occupation

Civil/Public Servant

1.923 (0.984 - 3.759)

0.056

1.684 (0.451 - 6.293)

0.439

Self-employed

0.385 (0.252 - 0.586)

0.000

0.902 (0.290 - 2.806

0.859

Unemployed

Reference

-

Reference

-

Monthly Income

<30,000

0.164 (0.084 - 0.320)

0.000

0.194 (0.057 - 0.668)

0.009

30,000-100,000

0.943 (0.586 - 1.517)

0.808

0.508 (0.178 - 1.450

0.206

>100,000

Reference

-

Reference

-

Number of Under-5 Children in Household

1-2

0.452 (0.314 - 0.650)

0.000

0.283 (0.099 - 0.811)

0.019

3+

Reference

-

Reference

-

Source of Drinking Water

Improved

0.877 (0.600 - 1.282)

0.499

2.052 (0.834 - 5.051)

0.118

Unimproved

Exclusive Breastfeeding

Yes

1.500 (0.826 - 2.723)

0.183

2.161 (0.888 - 5.262)

0.090

No

Reference

-

Reference

-

Table 5. Factors Associated with Poor Knowledge of Caregivers on diarrhea and its Management in Urban Areas.

Variable

COR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

p-value

Respondent's Age

15-25 years

1.750 (0.861 - 3.557)

0.122

0.610 (0.202 - 1.841)

0.381

25- 35 years

2.875 (1.923 - 4.299)

0.000

0.684 (0.295 - 1.585)

0.375

>35 years

Reference

-

Reference

-

Marital Status

Currently married

3.750 (2.646 - 5.315)

0.000

0.853 (0.379 - 1.923)

0.702

Not Married

0.835

Education Level

Below secondary

0.917 (0.404 - 2.077)

0.670 (0.206 - 2.181)

0.506

Secondary and above

Reference

-

Reference

-

Occupation

Civil/Public Servant

8.214 (4.717 - 14.306)

0.000

1.989 (0.453 - 8.737)

0.362

Self-employed

1.750 (1.187 - 2.581)

0.005

0.936 (0.237 - 3.698)

0.924

Unemployed

Monthly Income

<30,000

1.208 (0.704 - 2.075)

0.493

0.159 (0.049 - 0.522)

0.002

30,000-100,000

2.742 (1.817 - 4.137)

0.000

0.365 (0.123 - 1.084)

0.070

>100,000

Reference

-

Reference

-

Number of Under-5 Children in Household

1-2

3.155 (2.348 - 4.239)

0.000

0.650 (0.106 - 4.004)

0.642

3+

Reference

-

Reference

-

Source of Drinking Water

Improved

3.615 (2.659 - 4.915)

0.000

7.948 (1.673 - 37.755)

0.009

Unimproved

Reference

-

Reference

-

Exclusive Breastfeeding

Yes

11.545 (6.236 - 21.371)

0.000

7.484 (3.278 - 17.087)

0.000

No

Reference

-

Reference

-

4. Discussion
This study reveals a significantly higher prevalence of diarrhea in rural areas compared to urban areas of Rivers State, Nigeria. This finding aligns with evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, where rural populations are more vulnerable due to poor sanitation, limited access to clean water, and suboptimal health-seeking behaviour .
An unexpected trend was the elevated prevalence of diarrhea among individuals aged >35 years in rural settings. While diarrhea research traditionally focuses on children under five years , these results highlight a potential burden among older adults, likely attributable to compromised immunity, poor hygiene practices, and caregiving responsibilities. This finding supports Ezeh et al. , who emphasized adult vulnerability to waterborne diseases in underserved populations. Marital status did not significantly influence diarrhea prevalence between urban and rural respondents. However, the generally higher rates in rural communities suggest that structural disadvantages outweigh personal characteristics, consistent with the findings of Ajayi and Adebayo .
Education, typically considered protective against illness, did not show this effect in rural areas. Caregivers with secondary education or higher recorded even higher diarrhea prevalence compared to their less-educated counterparts. By contrast, in urban areas, the expected inverse relationship between education and prevalence was observed. This discrepancy suggests that formal education in rural contexts may not consistently translate into health-promoting behaviours, possibly due to poor infrastructure, limited health services, or ineffective health messaging .
Occupational status also revealed rural disparities. Civil/public servants and self-employed caregivers in rural areas exhibited high diarrhea prevalence, contradicting assumptions that employment confers health advantages. This observation supports Afolabi et al. , who noted that job type does not necessarily translate into improved living conditions or health outcomes in rural Nigeria. Similarly, income levels were positively associated with diarrhea prevalence in both urban and rural areas. This contradicts existing literature and may reflect misreporting, poor spending priorities, or a lack of investment in health-related needs .
Household size also influenced prevalence. In urban areas, households with three or more under-five children reported higher diarrhea rates, consistent with evidence linking overcrowding to increased faecal-oral disease transmission . By contrast, rural household data appeared inconsistent, likely due to recall errors or reporting bias.
Water source quality was a clear determinant in rural areas: unimproved sources were strongly associated with diarrhea. In contrast, urban areas showed little variation by water source, possibly indicating other risk factors like food contamination or poor hygiene practices . Exclusive breastfeeding appeared protective in rural areas, consistent with the WHO guidelines. However, urban data revealed a reverse trend, potentially due to misreporting or cultural bias, as discussed by Adepoju et al. .
Regarding caregiver knowledge, urban respondents displayed stronger awareness, more accurate symptom identification, and better management practices than their rural counterparts. While the majority of urban caregivers had heard of diarrhea, only about half of rural respondents were aware, a pattern echoed by Oloruntoba et al. . Similarly, rural caregivers struggled more with recognizing symptoms or identifying appropriate treatments such as oral rehydration solution (ORS). Preventive strategies were more commonly cited by urban caregivers, who frequently mentioned handwashing, access to clean water, and timely treatment. These behaviours are likely reinforced by higher literacy levels, better access to media, and proximity to health facilities . By contrast, one-third of rural caregivers could not name any preventive measures, revealing an urgent need for targeted rural health education.
A significant knowledge gap exists between rural and urban caregivers. The mean knowledge score was significantly higher in urban areas than in rural settings, as confirmed by t-test analysis. Moreover, while approximately two-thirds of urban caregivers demonstrated good knowledge, only a small proportion of rural respondents did so, highlighting systemic inequities in health communication and education . Sources of health information also differed between settings. Urban caregivers relied more on formal institutions, whereas rural respondents depended largely on informal sources, including family and friends. These findings underscore the need for structured rural outreach through culturally appropriate channels .
Knowledge of diarrhea also varies by location. More than half of urban caregivers correctly identified unclean water as a major cause, while less than a third of rural caregivers did so. Many rural respondents attributed diarrhea to teething or were uncertain, reflecting deep-rooted cultural beliefs . Regression analyses further showed that younger caregivers (15-25 years) in rural areas had significantly poorer knowledge, a pattern linked to inexperience and limited exposure to health information . This age-related trend was not significant in urban settings, likely due to better access to education and healthcare services.
Educational attainment remained a strong predictor of good knowledge in both settings. Caregivers with secondary education or higher consistently had better awareness, reaffirming the critical role of education in health literacy . Income and occupation were also associated with knowledge: civil/public servants and higher-income earners displayed better understanding, whereas unemployed and low-income caregivers were more likely to have poor knowledge, supporting conclusions by Musa et al. .
Access to improved water sources and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding were associated with better knowledge in both settings, suggesting that health-promoting behaviours are often interconnected with exposure to health information . However, in urban areas, a counterintuitive finding showed that caregivers with access to improved water sources had higher odds of poor knowledge. This may reflect a false sense of security that discourages active learning, as suggested by Ogbo et al. .
5. Conclusion
This study reveals a significant urban-rural disparity in both the prevalence of diarrhea and caregiver knowledge in Rivers State, Nigeria. Rural communities reported higher diarrhea prevalence, driven by persistent challenges such as inadequate access to clean water, poor sanitation, and limited healthcare infrastructure. In contrast, lower prevalence in urban areas reflects better access to health services, hygiene practices, and public health information.
Caregivers in rural areas also demonstrated markedly lower knowledge of diarrhea symptoms, causes, and management, with misconceptions like attributing diarrhea to teething remaining common. Urban caregivers showed better awareness, supported by greater access to media, formal education, and health facilities.
Sociodemographic and behavioural factors—particularly education, income, occupation, age, exclusive breastfeeding, and water source—were significantly associated with knowledge levels. Higher education, formal employment, and improved income correlated with better knowledge, while young and unemployed caregivers in rural settings were more likely to have a poor understanding.
These findings underscore the urgent need for tailored, culturally appropriate health education programs in rural communities. Strengthening rural health infrastructure and ensuring equitable access to health information are critical steps toward reducing the diarrhea burden and closing the urban-rural health gap in Nigeria.
Abbreviations

WHO

World Health Organization

UNICEF

United Nations Children’s Fund

NPC

National Population Commission

ORT

Oral Rehydration Therapy

LMICs

Low- and Middle-Income Countries

LGAs

Local Government Areas

OR

Odds Ratio

CL

Confidence Interval

COR

Crude Odds Ratio

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

Acknowledgments
We extend our sincere gratitude to all the caregivers who participated in the study. Additionally, we deeply thank the community heads for granting us access to the communities during the data collection periods.
Author Contributions
Sophia Soberekonba Tariah: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Software, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing Original Draft, Writing – review & editing
Owhonka Aleruchi: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Validation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Anthony Ike Wegbom: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Software, Validation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Ethical Consideration and Informed Consent
The Ethical Review Committee, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, and Rivers State University granted ethical approval (Approval No: RSU/FBMS/REC/24/088). Written informed consent was obtained. Participation was voluntary, and all data were kept confidential and used strictly for research purposes.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.
References
[1] UNICEF. (2023). Scaling up ORS and zinc use to reduce diarrhea-related mortality. Retrieved from
[2] National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF.
[3] Oluwatoyin, R. F., Durojaiye, O. P., & Fakorede, O. A. (2021). Determinants of caregivers’ knowledge and home management of diarrhea among under-five children in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 2(2), 34-43.
[4] World Health Organization. (2022). Diarrhea disease fact sheet.
[5] Olayinka, O. O., Olatona, F. A., & Agbaje, O. S. (2020). Water supply and sanitation practices in rural and urban communities of Rivers State, Nigeria: Implications for policy. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 11(1), 1022.
[6] Kaniambady, S. (2018). A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study on Prevalence of Diarrhea among Children of Under Five Years of Age and to Assess the Knowledge and Utilization of Oral Rehydration Therapy among their Mothers of RHTC Sampaje, Kodagu (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India).
[7] World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Diarrhea l disease: Key facts.
[8] Akinyemi, J. O., Bamgboye, E. A., & Ayeni, O. (2018). Care-seeking patterns for fatal childhood illness in Nigeria. Annals of Global Health, 84(4), 638-649.
[9] Abate, B. B., Zemariam, A. B., Wondimagegn, A., Abebe, G. K., Araya, F. G., Kassie, A. M., & Bizuayehu, M. A. (2024). Knowledge, attitude and practice of home management of diarrhea among under-five children in East Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one, 19(2), e0298801.
[10] Boadi, K. O., & Kuitunen, M. (2005). Childhood diarrheal morbidity in the Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana: Socio-economic, environmental and behavioral risk determinants. World Health & Population, 7(3), 22-34.
[11] Desta, B. K., Assimamaw, N. T., & Ashenafi, T. D. (2017). Knowledge, practice, and associated factors of Home‐Based management of diarrhea among caregivers of children attending under‐five clinic in Fagita Lekoma District, Awi Zone, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016. Nursing research and practice, 2017(1), 8084548.
[12] Kukeba, M. W., Lukman, S., Darcha, R., & Doat, A. R. (2021). Caregivers' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding diarrhea in children under five years old in Sub-Saharan Africa: An integrative narrative review. Asian Journal of Pediatric Research, 7(4), 1-27.
[13] Thiam, S., Sy, I., Schindler, C., Niang-Diène, A., Faye, O., Utzinger, J., & Cissé, G. (2019). Knowledge and practices of mothers and caregivers on diarrhea l management among under 5-year-old children in a medium-size town of Senegal. Acta tropica, 194, 155-164.
[14] World Health Organization (WHO) & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022: Special focus on gender. World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF.
[15] Kadam, P., & Bhalerao, S. (2019). Sample size calculation. International Journal of Ayurveda Research, 10(1), 55-57.
[16] Pourhoseingholi, M. A., Vahedi, M., & Rahimzadeh, M. (2021). Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench, 14(4), 329-333.
[17] Bandoh, D. A., Dwomoh, D., Yirenya-Tawiah, D., Kenu, E., & Dzodzomenyo, M. (2024). Prevalence and correlates of diarrhoea among children under five in selected coastal communities in Ghana. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 43(1), 95.
[18] Mohammed, M. O. M. (2024). Prevalence and risk factors associated with under-five years children diarrhea in Malawi: Application of survey logistic regression. Heliyon, 10(7).
[19] Adeleye, A., & Anyanwu, F. (2025). Knowledge, perception, and practice of oral rehydration solution among caregivers in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 12(2), 145-153.
[20] Hersi, A., Hassan, I., & Warsame, M. (2025). Knowledge, attitude, and practice on WASH among households in Somalia: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 44(1), 12.
[21] Mengistie, B., Berhane, Y., & Worku, A. (2018). Predictors of oral rehydration therapy use among under-five children with diarrhea in eastern Ethiopia: A community-based study. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 37(1), 1-10.
[22] Akinyemi, O. O., Bamgboye, E. A., & Ayeni, O. O. (2021). Diarrhea among under-five children in Nigeria: What has changed over time? Journal of Public Health in Africa, 12(3), 187-194.
[23] Okon, E. A., Udoh, E. E., & Akpan, M. E. (2021). Misconceptions and health-seeking behavior in diarrheal illness: Evidence from urban slums in Nigeria. Journal of Health Research and Policy, 6(1), 25-32.
[24] Ezeh, O. K., Agho, K. E., Dibley, M. J., Hall, J., & Page, A. N. (2020). Risk factors for diarrhea in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 350.
[25] Ajayi, A. I., & Adebayo, S. B. (2019). Rural-urban differentials in child health: Evidence from Nigeria demographic and health survey. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 11(3), 71-80.
[26] Olumide, E. A., Osungbade, K. O., & Adekanle, D. A. (2018). Determinants of diarrhea l diseases among under-five children in Nigeria: The roles of maternal education and sanitary conditions. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 22(4), 131-139.
[27] Bello, A. O., Sulaiman, A. B., & Yusuf, O. B. (2021). Influence of maternal education and health care services on diarrhea l morbidity among under-five children in urban Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 30(1), 12-20.
[28] Afolabi, M. O., Adeyemi, O. A., & Osibogun, A. O. (2020). Occupational exposure and diarrheal disease prevalence among rural Nigerian households. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 49(1), 57-65.
[29] Kumi-Kyereme, A., & Amo-Adjei, J. (2020). Household wealth and health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana. Health & Place, 65, 102399.
[30] Olayinka, A. I., Oni, G. A., & Aluko, M. (2019). Economic status and child health in Nigeria: Paradoxical trends. Nigerian Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences, 18(2), 65-72.
[31] UNICEF & World Health Organization. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2023 update. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF.
[32] Nnebue, C. C., Ibeh, C. C., & Duru, C. B. (2021). Sanitation practices and prevalence of diarrhea among caregivers of under-five children in urban Nigeria. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(2), 686-692.
[33] Adepoju, O. E., Akpan, I. A., & Odusanya, O. O. (2017). Patterns of infant feeding and its effect on diarrhea l diseases among infants in Lagos, Nigeria. African Health Sciences, 17(4), 1074-1082.
[34] Oloruntoba, E. O., Folarin, T. B., & Ayede, A. I. (2020). Impact of health education on knowledge and home management of childhooddiarrhea among caregivers in rural Nigeria. Tropical Medicine and Health, 48(1), 40.
[35] Akinyemi, J. O., & Owoaje, E. T. (2020). Knowledge of diarrhea management among caregivers of under-five children in Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Pediatrics, 20(1), 523.
[36] Ogbo, F. A., Agho, K. E., & Page, A. (2019). Diarrhea and its management among under-five children in Nigeria: A national survey. BMJ Open, 9(2), e024932.
[37] Musa, T. L., Ezeoke, G. G., & Sani, M. M. (2022). Barriers to effective diarrhea management in rural Nigerian communities. Nigerian Medical Journal, 63(3), 170-175.
[38] Adeyemo, D. O., Abubakar, R., & Ibrahim, M. (2018). Knowledge and management of childhood diarrhea among mothers in rural communities of northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Public Health, 32(2), 150-158.
[39] Ajayi, I. O., Akpan, M. I., & Adebayo, A. M. (2020). Rural mothers’ perceptions and health-seeking behaviour for diarrhea in under-five children in Nigeria. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(2), 763-770.
[40] Afolabi, R. F., Olanipekun, T. O., & Ogunyemi, A. O. (2021). diarrhea knowledge and prevention practices among caregivers of under-five children in Southwest Nigeria. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 13(1), 2875.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tariah, S. S., Aleruchi, O., Wegbom, A. I. (2025). Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria. World Journal of Public Health, 10(4), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tariah, S. S.; Aleruchi, O.; Wegbom, A. I. Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria. World J. Public Health 2025, 10(4), 497-511. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tariah SS, Aleruchi O, Wegbom AI. Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria. World J Public Health. 2025;10(4):497-511. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17,
      author = {Sophia Soberekonba Tariah and Owhonka Aleruchi and Anthony Ike Wegbom},
      title = {Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
    },
      journal = {World Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {497-511},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20251004.17},
      abstract = {Diarrhea remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among children in low-resource settings such as Nigeria. This study assessed the prevalence of childhood diarrhea and caregivers’ knowledge of its management in urban and rural communities of Rivers State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to caregivers. Diarrhea prevalence and knowledge levels were estimated in rural and urban settings. Statistical analyses, such as percentages for prevalence, Chi-square tests for association, and binary logistic regression to identify the predictors of poor knowledge management strategies. All statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Diarrhea prevalence was significantly higher in rural areas (60.7%; 95% CI: 53.1%-67.9%) compared to urban areas (38.8%; 95% CI: 33.0%-45.0%). Knowledge levels also differed markedly: rural caregivers (n = 163) had a mean knowledge score of 10.15 ± 4.402, with 64.4% classified as having poor knowledge, while urban caregivers (n = 250) achieved a higher mean score of 14.92 ± 4.669, with 76.0% demonstrating good knowledge. The difference was statistically significant (t = -7.43, p < 0.001). Urban caregivers had better access to healthcare services, improved water sources, and higher education levels, which contributed to more effective diarrhea management practices, including greater uptake of exclusive breastfeeding (54.8% vs. 28.2% in rural areas). Key predictors of poor knowledge included young age, low income, limited education, lack of exclusive breastfeeding, and use of unimproved water sources. Surprisingly, urban caregivers using improved water sources were more likely to have poor knowledge, possibly due to false perceptions of safety. Significant disparities in diarrhea prevalence and caregiver knowledge exist between urban and rural areas. Targeted health education and improved rural infrastructure are critical to reducing this burden.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Burden of Childhood Diarrhea and Knowledge of Management Strategies Among Caregivers in Rural and Urban Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
    
    AU  - Sophia Soberekonba Tariah
    AU  - Owhonka Aleruchi
    AU  - Anthony Ike Wegbom
    Y1  - 2025/10/27
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17
    T2  - World Journal of Public Health
    JF  - World Journal of Public Health
    JO  - World Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 497
    EP  - 511
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-6059
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20251004.17
    AB  - Diarrhea remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among children in low-resource settings such as Nigeria. This study assessed the prevalence of childhood diarrhea and caregivers’ knowledge of its management in urban and rural communities of Rivers State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to caregivers. Diarrhea prevalence and knowledge levels were estimated in rural and urban settings. Statistical analyses, such as percentages for prevalence, Chi-square tests for association, and binary logistic regression to identify the predictors of poor knowledge management strategies. All statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Diarrhea prevalence was significantly higher in rural areas (60.7%; 95% CI: 53.1%-67.9%) compared to urban areas (38.8%; 95% CI: 33.0%-45.0%). Knowledge levels also differed markedly: rural caregivers (n = 163) had a mean knowledge score of 10.15 ± 4.402, with 64.4% classified as having poor knowledge, while urban caregivers (n = 250) achieved a higher mean score of 14.92 ± 4.669, with 76.0% demonstrating good knowledge. The difference was statistically significant (t = -7.43, p < 0.001). Urban caregivers had better access to healthcare services, improved water sources, and higher education levels, which contributed to more effective diarrhea management practices, including greater uptake of exclusive breastfeeding (54.8% vs. 28.2% in rural areas). Key predictors of poor knowledge included young age, low income, limited education, lack of exclusive breastfeeding, and use of unimproved water sources. Surprisingly, urban caregivers using improved water sources were more likely to have poor knowledge, possibly due to false perceptions of safety. Significant disparities in diarrhea prevalence and caregiver knowledge exist between urban and rural areas. Targeted health education and improved rural infrastructure are critical to reducing this burden.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Methodology
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Ethical Consideration and Informed Consent
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information