Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach

Published in Hydrology (Volume 13, Issue 1)
Received: 11 February 2025     Accepted: 24 February 2025     Published: 7 March 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop non-stationary rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) models or curves for Umuahia, in South East Nigeria. The IDF model development was actualized using a 31-year rainfall record (1992-2022), obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency, NIMET. The research employed trend analysis using Mann-Kendall test and change point detection through CUSUM and Sequential Mann Kendall tests to establish the presence of non-stationarity in rainfall patterns. Three different General Extreme Value (GEV) distribution models were evaluated to determine the best-fit non-stationary model using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results revealed a significant increasing trend in rainfall intensity (p-value = 0.006) with change points identified in 2002-2003. The GEVt-I model consistently demonstrated superior performance across all duration intervals (5-1440 minutes) with the lowest AIC values. A generalized non-stationary IDF model was developed, showing excellent predictive capability (R² = 0.992, MSE = 38.09). The findings highlight the importance of adopting non-stationary approaches for infrastructure design in Umuahia, as traditional stationary methods may significantly underestimate rainfall intensities in the context of climate change. The result from the trend and change point revealed that climate change influences rainfall pattern in Umuahia. Interestingly, the findings of this study align with global trends in climate change impacts on precipitation patterns and underscore the urgent need to update design standards and infrastructure planning approaches in Umuahia, South East of Nigeria.

Published in Hydrology (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19
Page(s) 83-89
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF), Non-stationary Modeling, Climate Change, General Extreme Value (GEV), Distribution, Mann-Kendall Trend Analysis, Change Point Detection

1. Introduction
Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) relationships are hydrological tools that aids engineers in the design of hydraulic structures and urban drainage systems . The IDF curves enables engineers to estimate the intensity of rainfall that would be produced for a particular duration and return period thereby enabling engineers and planners to develop resilient infrastructure that can withstand extreme precipitation events. However, many IDF curves developed for most cities still assume stationarity. Stationarity is the concept where the statistical parameters of the rainfall or the rainfall patterns remain constant over time. However, utilization of this assumption for the development of all IDF curves is flawed as there have been emerging evidence that climate change impacts the precipitation patterns across most cities . Willem et al. stated that the climate change should be considered when designing sewer systems or urban drainage as it reduces the vulnerability of cities as lesser sewer system surcharge or urban drainage flooding are experienced due to extreme events . In recent decades, climate change has significantly altered precipitation patterns globally, leading to more frequent and intense rainfall events in many regions . This shift has particularly affected tropical regions like Nigeria, where rapid urbanization compounds the challenges posed by changing rainfall patterns. The need to understand and quantify these changes has become increasingly urgent, especially in urban areas where infrastructure design depends heavily on accurate rainfall predictions .
Utilization of non-stationary approach for development of IDF curves help quantify the effect that climate change has on rainfall intensity. The utilization of non-stationary approach for IDF analysis represents a significant advancement over traditional stationary methods as it provides accurate representation of the rainfall intensity in areas experiencing significant climate change. Non-stationarity assumes that the rainfall parameters change with time. By incorporating time-varying parameters, non-stationary models can better capture the evolving nature of rainfall patterns influenced by climate change . This approach is particularly relevant for regions like Umuahia, Nigeria, where rapid urbanization and climate change impacts intersect to create complex hydrological challenges. Ekwueme et al. reported that Umuahia was significantly impacted by climate change, as there was significant increasing trend in the rainfall intensity in the last three decades .
The assessment of rainfall patterns in Umuahia is crucial due to its location within the Niger Delta region and its vulnerability to flooding events. Traditional IDF curves, based on stationary assumptions, may no longer provide adequate design standards for infrastructure for Umuahia. The General Extreme Value (GEV) distribution widely recognized for its ability to model extreme events, offers a robust framework for incorporating non-stationarity in rainfall analysis . This study aims to develop non-stationary IDF curves for Umuahia using long-term rainfall data and evaluate the existence of climate change signals in local precipitation patterns.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
Umuahia, the capital city of Abia State, is situated in southeastern Nigeria within the Niger Delta region, at 5.5544°N latitude and 5.7932°E longitude, Figure 1. The city experiences a tropical climate characterized by a rainy season from April to October and a dry season from November to March. Umuahia's climate is influenced by its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean and its location within the Guinea Forest-Savanna mosaic ecoregion. The area typically receives significant annual rainfall, making it susceptible to flooding events and other rainfall-related challenges. Rapid urbanization in recent years has further heightened the city's vulnerability to climate change impacts, particularly concerning changing rainfall patterns.
2.2. Data Collection
The study utilized long historical rainfall data of about three decades. A 31-year rainfall records starting from 1992 to 2022 were obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) for Umuahia. The data obtained were the 24-hour monthly rainfall record for Umuahia. Smaller rainfall duration records were obtained by downscaling the 24-hour rainfall record utilizing Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) model which is given by Equation (1) . The shorter duration record obtained included 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 360, and 720 minutes.
Rt=R24t2413(1)
Where Rt = Downscaled rainfall precipitation, R24 = daily rainfall precipitation (mm), t = time.
Figure 1. Map of Study Area, Umuahia City in South Eastern Nigeria.
2.3. Development of Non-Stationary IDF Model
Prior to the development of the rainfall intensity duration frequency models, trend and change point analysis were carried out. The trend analysis was carried out to establish that the statistical parameter of the rainfall varied over time and validate the utilization of non-stationary IDF model development. Also, change point analysis was carried out to identify when there was significant change in the rainfall data. Mann Kendall was utilized for the trend change while Distribution free CUSUM and Sequential Mann Kendall were used in establishing the change point year. Ekwueme et al. presented the detailed description on how trend and change point analysis were carried out for Umuahia .
The development of the non-stationary IDF model was based on the General Extreme Value (GEV) distribution . The GEV distribution was adapted for modeling different behavioural extremes with three distribution parameters, notably: location, scale, and shape parameters . The standard cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the GEV as given by Coles et al. (2001) is presented in Equation (2).
Fx=exp-1+ξtx-μ(t)σ(t)--1ξ(t)forξ0(2)
Where F(x) = Cumulative distribution function, μ = mean (location), σ= standard deviation (scale) and, ξ = shape parameter of three behavioral parameter extremes.
The maximum likelihood estimator was the statistical procedure used for estimating the distribution parameters, because the method could easily be extended to the non-stationary evaluation. Non-stationarity is introduced by virtue of expressing one or more of the statistical parameters of the GEV as a function of time . Three linear non-stationary expressions were employed for the development of the IDF models, and they are presented in Table 1. The best non-stationary model was selected based on the AIC and BIC goodness of fit. The non-stationary model with the lowest AIC and BIC were deemed to be the expression that best fit the non-stationarity of the rainfall. R-studio was utilized for obtaining the non-stationary model parameters and computing the rainfall intensity.
Table 1. Types of Selected GEV Linear Parameter Models.

Model Type

Parameter Combination

Remark

(i) GEVt – 0

μt= μ

σt= σ

ξt= ξ

Stationary parameter model

(ii) GEVt – I

μt= μ0+μ1t

σt= σ

ξt= ξ

μt= μ

Non-stationary parameter model

(iii) GEVt – II

σt=σ0+σ1t

ξt= ξ

μt= μ0+μ1t

Non-stationary parameter model

(iv) GEVt – III

μt= μ0+μ1t

σt= σ0+σ1t

ξt= ξ

Non-stationary parameter model

Source:
3. Results
The results of the trend and change point analysis for Umuahia are presented in Table 2. The Mann-Kendall test revealed a statistically significant increasing trend in rainfall, with a test statistic of 1.1418 and a p-value of 0.006. This finding indicates that the rainfall or precipitation has been on the rise in the last 31 years (1992 to 2022). The change point analysis result in Table 2 showed that both change point methods produce similar result. The CUSUM test identified 2002 as a significant change point year at both 90% and 95% confidence intervals, suggesting a marked shift in rainfall patterns around this period. This observation was further corroborated by the Sequential Mann Kendall (SQMK) test, which detected a change point in 2003, characterized by a single intersection of the prograde and retrograde curves. The temporal proximity of these change points (2002-2003) strengthens the evidence for a substantial modification in rainfall patterns during this period for Umuahia. The result obtained from Mann Kendall and change point analysis provide sufficient evidence that the effect of climate change influence rainfall or precipitation in Umuahia, therefore non-stationary method should be utilized for the IDF model development.
Table 2. Mann Kendall and Change Point for Umuahia.

Test Type

Statistic

p-value

Trend/Change Point

Remark

Mann-Kendall

1.1418

0.006

Increasing

Significant

CUSUM

9.0

-

2002

Significant (CI: 90%, 95%)

SQMK

-

-

2003

Just one interception of the prograde and retrograde

The development of the non-stationary IDF model is presented in Table 3. The analysis of GEV parameters reveals interesting patterns across different time durations ranging from 5 to 1440 minutes. For the 5-minute duration, the GEVt-I model demonstrated the best fit with the lowest AIC value of 196.264 and BIC of 202.00. This pattern of GEVt-I showing superior performance consistently appears across all time durations, as evidenced by it consistently achieving the lowest AIC values. For intermediate durations (10-60 minutes), the models maintained similar behavioural patterns. The 10-minute duration analysis showed the GEVt-I model performing optimally with an AIC of 212.487. This trend continued through the 20-minute duration (AIC = 227.338) and 30-minute duration (AIC = 236.338), with the location parameters gradually adjusting but maintaining the model's superior fit. For longer durations (120-1440 minutes), the pattern persisted with GEVt-I consistently showing the best fit. The 720-minute duration analysis revealed an AIC of 302.018 for GEVt-I, while the 1440-minute duration showed an AIC of 316.344, both being the lowest values among their respective duration groups.
The computed rainfall intensity utilized GEV-I model is visualized in Figure 2. The rainfall intensity is plotted against the log of the durations for different return periods. The curves exhibit the characteristic hyperbolic shape typical of IDF relationships, with intensity decreasing as duration increases, and higher curves corresponding to longer return periods. Figure 2 provide a valuable tool that can be utilized by engineers in obtaining the rainfall intensity for any duration and return period for Umuahia. For ease of obtaining the rainfall intensity for any duration and return period, a general IDF model was developed, and the result is presented in Table 4. The model developed showed excellent predictive capability with a very high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.992) and a relatively low Mean Square Error (MSE = 38.09). The high R² value indicates that the model explains approximately 99.2% of the variability in rainfall intensity, suggesting it is highly reliable for predicting rainfall intensities across various durations and return periods.
Table 3. Evaluation of the performance of GEV parameters used for non-stationary and stationary models for Umuahia.

Time (mins)

Models

Location Parameter

Scale

Shape Parameter

BIC

AIC

5

GEVt – I

-181.219 + 0.097t

4.766

-0.204

202.00

196.264

GEVt – II

13.694

4.907 – 0.0001t

-0.231

205.06

199.319

GEVt - III

-241.848 + 0.127t

14.439– 0.005t

-0.204

204.94

197.766

10

GEVt – I

-63.339 + 0.040t

6.306

-0.222

218.222

212.487

GEVt – II

17.253

6.182 - 0.0002t

-0.231

219.386

213.650

GEVt - III

-188.624 + 0.103t

13.781– 0.004t

-0.210

220.125

212.955

20

GEVt – I

-31.406 + 0.027t

8.0489

-0.225

233.074

227.338

GEVt – II

21.737

7.787 + 0.0002t

-0.231

233.700

227.964

GEVt - III

-3.476+1.841t

2.028– 0.0006t

-0.218

233.623

226.453

30

GEVt – I

24.015 + 0.0004t

9.424

-0.230

242.075

236.338

GEVt – II

24.884

8.915 + 0.0002t

-0.231

242.082

236.347

GEVt - III

-63.906 + 0.044t

12.204– 0.002t

-0.236

244.682

237.512

60

GEVt – I

23.921 + 0.0037t

11.865

-0.233

256.343

250.607

GEVt – II

31.523

3.342 + 0.0003t

-0.231

256.404

250.668

GEVt - III

-487.80 + 0.259t

31.580– 0.010t

-0.211

256.38

249.214

120

GEVt – I

36.189 + 0.0017t

14.909

-0.232

270.707

264.971

GEVt – II

39.503

14.15 + 0.0004t

-0.231

270.729

264.993

GEVt - III

-53.978 + 0.047t

17.478 – 0.002t

-0.227

273.55

266.385

360

GEVt – I

56.024 + 0.0005t

21.489

-0.231

293.428

287.692

GEVt – II

56.978

20.41 + 0.0005t

-0.231

293.432

287.696

GEVt - III

-30.889 + 0.044t

23.496– 0.001t

-0.239

296.475

289.305

720

GEVt – I

70.603 + 0.0006t

27.078

-0.232

307.754

302.018

GEVt – II

71.787

25.71 + 0.0007t

-0.232

307.759

302.023

GEVt - III

20.065 + 0.0259t

27.47– 0.0003t

-0.231

311.005

303.835

1440

GEVt – I

88.962 + 0.0008t

34.120

-0.232

322.080

316.344

GEVt – II

90.478

32.39 + 0.0009t

-0.232

322.085

316.349

GEVt - III

88.902 + 0008t

32.40 + 0.0009t

-0.232

325.514

318.344

Figure 2. Computed Rainfall Intensity Duration Curves.
Table 4. GEV fitted General Non-stationary IDF (GNS-IDF) models for Umuahia.

S/N

Stations

IDF Models

R2

MSE

1

Umuahia

I = 315.26Tr 0.315Td  0.685

0.992

38.09

4. Discussion
The analysis of rainfall patterns in Umuahia revealed that there would be significant implications on infrastructure design if stationary models are utilized in developing IDF models. The Mann-Kendall test results showing an increasing trend (p-value = 0.006) and the identification of change points in 2002-2003 strongly indicate non-stationarity in rainfall patterns. Ekwueme et al. in a previous study have documented that Umuahia exhibits significant increasing trends in rainfall/precipitation . The finding provide evidence that non-stationary model must be utilized for development of rainfall intensity duration models.
The development of IDF models utilizing non-stationary models revealed that the GEVt-I was the best non-stationary model for Umuahia. This was confirmed by superior performance of GEVt-I across all durations, as evidenced by consistently lower AIC and BIC values. The GEV-I model that best represent that rainfall pattern in Umuahia suggests that the location parameters varied over the 31 years’ study duration. This indicate that the rainfall precipitation gradually increases from year to year while the variation within each year remains constant over the study duration. Utilization of stationary model will result to significantly underestimating the rainfall intensities as the increase in the rainfall precipitation is not captured in the stationary models. Underestimation of the rainfall intensity could lead to the design of inadequate drainage infrastructures thereby increasing the risk of flooding in Umuahia. Cheng and AghaKouchak demonstrated that stationary models could underestimate the 50-year precipitation by as much as 60% in some regions . The global trend towards non-stationary analysis is evident in literature. Sugahara et al. found that non-stationary models better captured the increasing intensity of extreme rainfall events . The use of non-stationary model for development of IDF model have been embraced in other part of the world. However, the adoption of non-stationary approaches in Nigeria has been relatively slow. Very limited studies have been done on non-stationary models in Nigeria. Nwaogazie and Sam found that most IDF studies in Nigeria still relied on stationary approaches despite growing evidence of climate change impacts . The implications of using stationary instead of non-stationary approaches in Umuahia are particularly of concern given its location in the Niger Delta region. AghaKouchak et al. emphasized the importance of non-stationary approaches in regions experiencing rapid climate change . Willem et al. noted that incorporating such non-stationary patterns in urban drainage design could reduce infrastructure vulnerability by up to 30% . These findings suggest an urgent need to update design standards and infrastructure planning approaches in Umuahia. Continuing to use stationary approach would not only underestimate future rainfall intensities but could also lead to systemic infrastructure inadequacies, particularly in urban drainage system.
5. Conclusion
This study aimed to develop non-stationary Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves for Umuahia, Nigeria, using a 31-year rainfall record (1992-2022) obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency. The result from the trend and change point revealed that climate change influences rainfall pattern in Umuahia. The detection of a significant increasing trend in rainfall intensity and the identification of change points in 2002-2003 provide strong evidence for the existence of non-stationarity in local precipitation patterns. The superior performance of the GEVt-I model across all duration intervals demonstrates the inadequacy of traditional stationary approach for modeling rainfall in this region. The findings in this study align with global trends in climate change impacts on precipitation patterns and underscore the urgent need to update design standards and infrastructure planning approaches in the region. The study's results suggest that continuing to use stationary IDF curves for infrastructure design in Umuahia could lead to significant underestimation of rainfall intensities, potentially resulting in inadequate infrastructure capacity.
Abbreviations

MSE

Mean Square Error

AIC

Akaike Information Criterion

NIMET

Nigerian Meteorological Agency

SQMK

Sequential Mann-Kendall

CUSUM

Cumulative Sum

BIC

Bayesian Information Criterion

GEV

General Extreme Value

IDF

Intensity-Duration-Frequency

Author Contributions
Chimeme Martin Ekwueme: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft
Ify Lawrence Nwaogazie: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Chiedozie Francis Ikebude: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Godwin Otunyo Amuchi: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing
Jonathan Onyekachi Irokwe: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing
Diaa Wissam El Hourani: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Abiodun, B. J., Adegoke, J., Abatan, A. A., Ibe, C. A., Egbebiyi, T. S., Engelbrecht, F., & Pinto, I. (2017). Potential impacts of climate change on extreme precipitation over four African coastal cities. Climatic Change, 143(3), 399-413.
[2] AghaKouchak, A., Cheng, L., Mazdiyasni, O., & Farahmand, A. (2018). Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(24), 8847-8852.
[3] Cheng, L., & AghaKouchak, A. (2014). Nonstationary precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves for infrastructure design in a changing climate. Scientific Reports, 4(1), 1-6.
[4] Coles, S., Bawa, J., Trenner, L. Sc & Dorazio, P. (2001). An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. London: Springer.
[5] Ekwueme, C. M., Nwaogazie, I. L., & Ikebude, C. (2024). Establishing Climate Change on Rainfall Trend, Variation and Change Point Pattern in Umuahia, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(11), 118–126.
[6] IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[7] Katz, R. W. (2013). Statistical methods for nonstationary extremes. In: Extremes in a changing climate (pp. 15-37). Dordrecht: Springer.
[8] Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Stouffer, R. J. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863), 573-574.
[9] Nashwan, M. S., Ismail, T. A. R. M. I. Z. I., & Ahmed, K. A. M. A. L. (2019). Non-stationary analysis of extreme rainfall in peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 14(3), 17-34.
[10] Nwaogazie, I. L., & Sam, M. G. (2020). A review study on stationary and non-stationary IDF models used in rainfall data analysis around the world from 1951-2020. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change, 10(12), 465-482.
[11] Sam, M. G., Nwaogazie, I. L., & Ikebude, C. (2021). Improving Indian meteorological department method for 24-hourly rainfall downscaling to shorter durations for IDF modeling. International Journal of Hydrology, 5(2), 72-82.
[12] Sam, M. G., Nwaogazie, I. L., & Ikebude, C. (2023a). Establishing Climatic Change on Rainfall Trend, Variation and Change Point Pattern in Benin City, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(5), 202-212.
[13] Sam, M. G., Nwaogazie, I. L., Ikebude, C., Inyang, U. J., & Irokwe, J. O. (2023b). Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Uyo-Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 15(5), 194-214.
[14] Silva, D. F. & Simonovic, S. P. (2020). Development of non-stationary rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for future climate conditions. Water resources research report No: 106. Department of civil and environmental engineering, western University, Canada.
[15] Sugahara, S., Da Rocha, R. P., & Silveira, R. (2009). Non-stationary frequency analysis of extreme daily rainfall in Sao Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 29(9), 1339-1349.
[16] Willems, P., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Olsson, J., & Nguyen, V. T. V. (2012). Climate change impact assessment on urban rainfall extremes and urban drainage: Methods and shortcomings. Atmospheric Research, 103, 106-118.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ekwueme, C. M., Nwaogazie, I. L., Ikebude, C. F., Amuchi, G. O., Irokwe, J. O., et al. (2025). Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach. Hydrology, 13(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ekwueme, C. M.; Nwaogazie, I. L.; Ikebude, C. F.; Amuchi, G. O.; Irokwe, J. O., et al. Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach. Hydrology. 2025, 13(1), 83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ekwueme CM, Nwaogazie IL, Ikebude CF, Amuchi GO, Irokwe JO, et al. Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach. Hydrology. 2025;13(1):83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19,
      author = {Chimeme Martin Ekwueme and Ify Lawrence Nwaogazie and Chiedozie Francis Ikebude and Godwin Otunyo Amuchi and Jonathan Oyekachi Irokwe and Diaa Wissam El Hourani},
      title = {Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach
    },
      journal = {Hydrology},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {83-89},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hyd.20251301.19},
      abstract = {The aim of this study is to develop non-stationary rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) models or curves for Umuahia, in South East Nigeria. The IDF model development was actualized using a 31-year rainfall record (1992-2022), obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency, NIMET. The research employed trend analysis using Mann-Kendall test and change point detection through CUSUM and Sequential Mann Kendall tests to establish the presence of non-stationarity in rainfall patterns. Three different General Extreme Value (GEV) distribution models were evaluated to determine the best-fit non-stationary model using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results revealed a significant increasing trend in rainfall intensity (p-value = 0.006) with change points identified in 2002-2003. The GEVt-I model consistently demonstrated superior performance across all duration intervals (5-1440 minutes) with the lowest AIC values. A generalized non-stationary IDF model was developed, showing excellent predictive capability (R² = 0.992, MSE = 38.09). The findings highlight the importance of adopting non-stationary approaches for infrastructure design in Umuahia, as traditional stationary methods may significantly underestimate rainfall intensities in the context of climate change. The result from the trend and change point revealed that climate change influences rainfall pattern in Umuahia. Interestingly, the findings of this study align with global trends in climate change impacts on precipitation patterns and underscore the urgent need to update design standards and infrastructure planning approaches in Umuahia, South East of Nigeria.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modeling Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) and Establishing Climate Change Existence in Umuahia - Nigeria Using Non-Stationary Approach
    
    AU  - Chimeme Martin Ekwueme
    AU  - Ify Lawrence Nwaogazie
    AU  - Chiedozie Francis Ikebude
    AU  - Godwin Otunyo Amuchi
    AU  - Jonathan Oyekachi Irokwe
    AU  - Diaa Wissam El Hourani
    Y1  - 2025/03/07
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19
    T2  - Hydrology
    JF  - Hydrology
    JO  - Hydrology
    SP  - 83
    EP  - 89
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7617
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20251301.19
    AB  - The aim of this study is to develop non-stationary rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) models or curves for Umuahia, in South East Nigeria. The IDF model development was actualized using a 31-year rainfall record (1992-2022), obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency, NIMET. The research employed trend analysis using Mann-Kendall test and change point detection through CUSUM and Sequential Mann Kendall tests to establish the presence of non-stationarity in rainfall patterns. Three different General Extreme Value (GEV) distribution models were evaluated to determine the best-fit non-stationary model using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results revealed a significant increasing trend in rainfall intensity (p-value = 0.006) with change points identified in 2002-2003. The GEVt-I model consistently demonstrated superior performance across all duration intervals (5-1440 minutes) with the lowest AIC values. A generalized non-stationary IDF model was developed, showing excellent predictive capability (R² = 0.992, MSE = 38.09). The findings highlight the importance of adopting non-stationary approaches for infrastructure design in Umuahia, as traditional stationary methods may significantly underestimate rainfall intensities in the context of climate change. The result from the trend and change point revealed that climate change influences rainfall pattern in Umuahia. Interestingly, the findings of this study align with global trends in climate change impacts on precipitation patterns and underscore the urgent need to update design standards and infrastructure planning approaches in Umuahia, South East of Nigeria.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

    Research Fields: Hydrology, Hydraulics, Water Quality, Rainfall modelling, Water Resources

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

    Research Fields: Hydrology, Hydraulics, Water Quality, Water Resources, Wastewater Design, Finite Element Modeling, Data Analysis & Modeling

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

    Research Fields: Hydrology, Hydraulics, Water Quality, Rainfall modelling, Water Resources

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

    Research Fields: Hydrology, Hydraulics, Culvert & Drainage network Design, Rain-fall Runoff modelling, Highway Design, Engineering Management

  • Centre for Geotechnical & Coastal Engineering Research, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

    Research Fields: Hydraulics, Coastal Protection, Geotechnical, Numerical Analysis & Modeling, Software Development & Engineering Application