A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space

Lv Bo; Gu Qiaoling; Zhi Yechao

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space

Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6)

Received: 11 October 2019 Published: 8 November 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.

Published in	International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
Page(s)	187-196
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maker Space, Cloud Platform, Mode, Comparative Study

References

[1]	Chen dejin. Comparative Analysis and Empirical Enlightenment of Foreign Maker Space Business Models [J]. Science Management Research, 2017, (03), 110-113. (in Chinese).
[2]	Wang youmei, Ye Ailing. From maker space to mass creation space: functional model and service path based on innovation 2.0 [J]. Research of Audio-Visual Education, 2015, (11): 5-12. (in Chinese).
[3]	Pan xinyu. Dynamic Strategy Analysis of Manufacturing Capacity Sharing in Cloud Manufacturing Environment [J]. Industrial Economy, 2016, (05): 16-29. (in Chinese).
[4]	Jia-bin Li, Shi-wei He, Wei-chuan Yin. The study of pallet pooling information platform Based on Cloud Computing [J]. Scientific Programming. 2018, (05): 1-5.
[5]	Radhika C, Kousalyadvi M, Balamurugan V. Business ecosystems - to dominate in the modern business [J]. IJSR -International Journal of Scientific Research, 2013, (05): 354-355.
[6]	Kindstrom D. Towards a service--based business model: key aspects for future competitive advantage [J]. European Management Journal, 2010, 28 (06): 479-490.
[7]	Zhang yuming, Wang fuyao. The Construction Elements and Implementation Path of Cloud Innovation Model--Based on the Case Study of Huawei Company [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2016, (01): 16-21. (in Chinese).
[8]	Jiliuxiang, Sheng Ge. Theoretical Foundation and Planning Framework of Cloud Entrepreneurial Ecosphere [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2015, (11): 1646-1653. (in Chinese).
[9]	Preimesberger, Chris. Cloud 2020: canonical's six trends shaping the future of cloud [N]. eWeek, 5/22/2018.
[10]	PR Newswire. A global cloud--based platform to connect professional women with flexible remote job opportunities is unveiled at the United Nation Event in New York City today [N]. PR Newswire US, 03/15/2017.
[11]	Tao F, Cheng Y, Xu L D, et al. CCIoT -CMfg: cloud computing and internet of things based cloud manufacturing service system [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2014, 10 (02): 1435-1442.
[12]	Tao F, Zhang L, Venkatesh V C, et al. Cloud manufacturing: A computing and service--oriented manufacturing model [J]. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2011, 225 (10): 1969 -1976.
[13]	Xu X. From Cloud Computing to Cloud Manufacturing [J]. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2012, 28 (01): 75-86.
[14]	Xiexuefang, Liu qing-liang. Ecological model of maker space in the innovation 2.0 era - comparison and enlightenment of China and foreign countries. Science research. 2018, (04): 577-585. (in Chinese).
[15]	Zhao yijing, Qianqinglan. Current characteristics and satisfaction evaluation of maker space in guangzhou [J]. Science and technology management research, 2017, (22): 93-98. (in Chinese).
[16]	Ouguoli, Wang ruizhe. Difficulties and countermeasures faced by the rapid development of Chinese sharing economy [J]. Economic aspect, 2017, (05): 54-59. (in Chinese).
[17]	Shao chuanlin, Wang liping. Research on the development path of science and technology finance from the perspective of innovation-driven [J]. Economic aspect, 2016, (11): 65-69. (in Chinese).
[18]	Zhang danning, Fu xiaoyun, Yi pingtao. Research on the development path of maker space industrial cluster in shenyang city -- based on operational efficiency measurement. Journal of northeast university (social science edition). 2017, (1): 34-40. (in Chinese).
[19]	Xiao yan, Mengjian. Research on “intelligent upgrading” of Chinese cultural industrial parks from the perspective of big data [J]. Economic aspect, 2017, (09): 112-116. (in Chinese).
[20]	Wang bo, Zhen feng, Zhu xianqiang. Connotation, development and planning strategy of Internet maker space -- based on investigation and analysis of Shanghai [J]. Urban planning, 2017, (09): 30-37. (in Chinese).
[21]	Zhengjuan, Konggangcheng. Current situation and characteristics of maker space with regional industrial characteristics - a survey on crowd innovation space and young entrepreneurs in chaoyang district, Beijing [J]. Journal of Beijing union university (humanities and social sciences edition), 2018, (04): 61-67. (in Chinese).
[22]	Chen wu, Li yanping. Cultivation of platform organizational competitiveness from the perspective of embeddability -- a multi-case study based on maker space [J]. Journal of economic management, 2018, (03): 74-91. (in Chinese).
[23]	Li zibiao, Liu shuang, Liu leilei. The value-added path of maker space to cultivate incubated small and medium-sized enterprises - experience from 69 crowd innovation Spaces in tianjin [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2018, (03): 73-79. (in Chinese).
[24]	Lvbo. Research on effective stimulation variables of virtual business incubator - based on CAS model and statistical comparison data [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2018, (02): 17-25. (in Chinese).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao. (2019). A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(6), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lv Bo; Gu Qiaoling; Zhi Yechao. A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2019, 7(6), 187-196. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao. A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2019;7(6):187-196. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12,
  author = {Lv Bo and Gu Qiaoling and Zhi Yechao},
  title = {A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {187-196},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  abstract = {This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space
AU  - Lv Bo
AU  - Gu Qiaoling
AU  - Zhi Yechao
Y1  - 2019/11/08
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 187
EP  - 196
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
AB  - This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lv Bo

Business School, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China
Gu Qiaoling

Business School, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China
Zhi Yechao

Business School, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao. (2019). A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(6), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lv Bo; Gu Qiaoling; Zhi Yechao. A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2019, 7(6), 187-196. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao. A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2019;7(6):187-196. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12,
  author = {Lv Bo and Gu Qiaoling and Zhi Yechao},
  title = {A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {187-196},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20190706.12},
  abstract = {This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space
AU  - Lv Bo
AU  - Gu Qiaoling
AU  - Zhi Yechao
Y1  - 2019/11/08
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 187
EP  - 196
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20190706.12
AB  - This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download