Objective: To evaluate effect of humanistic care on gynecological tumor patients. Methods: 112 patients diagnosed as gynecological tumor from January 2017 to June 2018 in hospital. The participants were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group. We use new nursing of humanistic care for the patients of intervention group. In control, the patients had traditional nursing services. The data was collected by medical history, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales (NSNS). Result: Most of participants had cervical cancer [34 (30.4%) & 41 (36.6%)]. Besides, nursing measure of intervention group had better influence than traditional nursing measure of control group (Pain level, 1.21±0.33 vs 3.04±0.44; sleep quality, 13.74±2.34 vs 10.49±2.51). In assessment of patients satisfaction, the assessments of very well were made by 88 (71.4%) people in intervention group. Conclusion: humanistic care can be effectively improved the outcome of treatment on gynecological tumor patients. The nursing measure of humanistic care made not only pain level of patient in treatment process was reduce but also sleep quality of patient was improved. However, the improvement effect was not strong for the outcome of nursing so that the new nursing measure had low effective rate in the treatment process.
| Published in | Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13 |
| Page(s) | 18-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Humanistic Care, Gynecological Tumor, Nursing
| [1] | Frisch N., Dossey B., Guzzeta C., Quinn J. AHNA Standards of Holistic Nursing Practice: Guidelines for Caring and Healing. Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD. 2000. |
| [2] | Buckley, J. Holism and a health-promoting approach to palliative care. Int. J. Palliat. Care. 2002; 8: 505–508. |
| [3] | Sarkis, J., Skoner, M., 1987. Analysis of the concept of holism in nursing practice. Holist. Nurs. Pract. 1987; 2: 61–70. |
| [4] | Leininger, M. M. Leininger's theory of nursing: cultural care diversity and universality. Nurs. Sci. Q. 1988; 1 (4): 152–160. |
| [5] | Woods, M. An ethic of care in nursing: past, present and future considerations. Ethics Social Welfare. 2011; 5 (3): 266–276. |
| [6] | Raja S., Hasnain M., Vadakumchery T., Hamad J., Shah R., Hoersch M. Identifying elements of patient-centered care in underserved populations: a qualitative study of patient perspectives. Plos One. 2015; 10 (5): 0126708. |
| [7] | Xu J., Liu Y. L., Luo J. Investigation on status quo of caring capacity of nursing staff and influencing factors. Chin Nurs Res. 2009; 23: 3306–3308. |
| [8] | Chen H., Zheng M. A., Lei W. N. Research on caring ability of surgical nurses in a 2A-level hospital. J Nurs Admin. 2012; 12 (4): 255–256. |
| [9] | Watson, J. Watsons theory of human caring and subjective living experiences: carative factors/caritas processes as a disciplinary guide to the professional nursing practice. Texto & Contexto Enf. 2017; 16 (1): 129–135. |
| [10] | Fernandezabascal E. G., Martindiaz M. D. Relations between dimensions of emotional intelligence, specific aspects of empathy, and non-verbal sensitivity. Front. Psychol. 2019; 10. |
| [11] | Hidayati L., Rifai F., Nimah L. Emotional Intelligence and Caring Behavior Among Muslim Nurse: A Study in Religious-Based Hospital in Surabaya Indonesia. 2017; 41. |
| [12] | Hajbaghery M. A., Shahsavarloo Z. R. Assessing the nursing and midwifery students competencies in communication with patients with severe communication problems. Nurs. Midwifery Stud. 2014; 3 (2): e18143. |
| [13] | Pun BT, et al. Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: results of the ICU liberation collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (1): 3–14. |
| [14] | MacLeod M., Thomson H. A., Upton C., Scott R., Chesson R. A.. Seamless Care in Physiotherapy: Does it exist at the interface of primary and secondary care? Physiotherapy. 2002; 11 (88): 677-686. |
| [15] | Bijur, P. E., Silver, W., Gallagher, E. J. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2001; 8: 1153–1157. |
| [16] | Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28: 193-213. |
| [17] | Thomas LH, Bond S. Measuring patients' satisfaction with nursing [J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1993; 23: 747-756. |
| [18] | Watson J. Love and caring ethics of face and hand— an invitation to the heart and our deep humanity. Nurs Adm Q 2003; 27: 197–202. |
APA Style
Manli Huang, Xinke Huang, Qiufang Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang. (2020). The Effect of Humanistic Care on Gynecological Tumor Patients. Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research, 8(1), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13
ACS Style
Manli Huang; Xinke Huang; Qiufang Zhang; Xuefeng Jiang. The Effect of Humanistic Care on Gynecological Tumor Patients. J. Cancer Treat. Res. 2020, 8(1), 18-20. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13
AMA Style
Manli Huang, Xinke Huang, Qiufang Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang. The Effect of Humanistic Care on Gynecological Tumor Patients. J Cancer Treat Res. 2020;8(1):18-20. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13,
author = {Manli Huang and Xinke Huang and Qiufang Zhang and Xuefeng Jiang},
title = {The Effect of Humanistic Care on Gynecological Tumor Patients},
journal = {Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {18-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jctr.20200801.13},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate effect of humanistic care on gynecological tumor patients. Methods: 112 patients diagnosed as gynecological tumor from January 2017 to June 2018 in hospital. The participants were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group. We use new nursing of humanistic care for the patients of intervention group. In control, the patients had traditional nursing services. The data was collected by medical history, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales (NSNS). Result: Most of participants had cervical cancer [34 (30.4%) & 41 (36.6%)]. Besides, nursing measure of intervention group had better influence than traditional nursing measure of control group (Pain level, 1.21±0.33 vs 3.04±0.44; sleep quality, 13.74±2.34 vs 10.49±2.51). In assessment of patients satisfaction, the assessments of very well were made by 88 (71.4%) people in intervention group. Conclusion: humanistic care can be effectively improved the outcome of treatment on gynecological tumor patients. The nursing measure of humanistic care made not only pain level of patient in treatment process was reduce but also sleep quality of patient was improved. However, the improvement effect was not strong for the outcome of nursing so that the new nursing measure had low effective rate in the treatment process.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of Humanistic Care on Gynecological Tumor Patients AU - Manli Huang AU - Xinke Huang AU - Qiufang Zhang AU - Xuefeng Jiang Y1 - 2020/02/18 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13 T2 - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research JF - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research JO - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research SP - 18 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7790 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20200801.13 AB - Objective: To evaluate effect of humanistic care on gynecological tumor patients. Methods: 112 patients diagnosed as gynecological tumor from January 2017 to June 2018 in hospital. The participants were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group. We use new nursing of humanistic care for the patients of intervention group. In control, the patients had traditional nursing services. The data was collected by medical history, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales (NSNS). Result: Most of participants had cervical cancer [34 (30.4%) & 41 (36.6%)]. Besides, nursing measure of intervention group had better influence than traditional nursing measure of control group (Pain level, 1.21±0.33 vs 3.04±0.44; sleep quality, 13.74±2.34 vs 10.49±2.51). In assessment of patients satisfaction, the assessments of very well were made by 88 (71.4%) people in intervention group. Conclusion: humanistic care can be effectively improved the outcome of treatment on gynecological tumor patients. The nursing measure of humanistic care made not only pain level of patient in treatment process was reduce but also sleep quality of patient was improved. However, the improvement effect was not strong for the outcome of nursing so that the new nursing measure had low effective rate in the treatment process. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: