This paper explores the intricate dynamics and evolving methodologies surrounding coffee bean and beverage quality, which are crucial determinants of market pricing. The quality of coffee is shaped by an intricate interplay of genetic, environmental, postharvest processing factors, which collectively account for up to 60% of its final quality. Postharvest processing methods including traditional and contemporary approaches like honey processing, anaerobic fermentation, and digestion methods or animal poop that involving animal interactions exhibit diverse impacts on the aromatic profile and sensory attributes of coffee. Among the most intriguing innovations are methods involving animal assistance, notably the production of Kopi Luwak, Black Ivory coffee, and other animal derived coffee variants, which leverage the unique fermentation processes occurring within the digestive tracts of animals such as civets, elephants, monkeys, bats, birds and Coati. The fermentation of beans in these novel methods influences not only the flavor and aroma but also raises ethical and sustainability concerns related to animal welfare. This review synthesizes recent findings on the impact of various processing techniques on coffee quality, highlights the potential for enhancing sensory characteristics through evolving methods, and underscores the importance of ethical sourcing practices in the face of consumer demand for unique, high-quality coffee. By advancing understanding in these areas, the paper aims to contribute to the continued innovation and improvement in coffee processing, with a focus on balancing quality, sustainability, and ethical considerations.
| Published in | Science Research (Volume 12, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12 |
| Page(s) | 126-134 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Animal Poop, Coffee, Evolving, Processing, Quality
| [1] | Haile, M. and Kang, W. H., 2019. The harvest and post-harvest management practices’ impact on coffee quality. Coffee-Production and Research, pp. 1-18. |
| [2] | Gonzalez-Rios O., M. L. Suarez-Quiroz, R. Boulanger, M. Barel, B. Guyot, J. P. Guiraud, S. Schorr-Galindo, 2007. Impact of “ecological” post-harvest processing on coffee aroma: II. Roasted coffee, J. Food Compos. Anal. 20 (3–4) (2007) 297–307. |
| [3] | Pereira, G. V. d. M., Neto, D. P. D. C., Júnior, A. I. M., V´asquez, Z. S., Medeiros, A. B. P., Vandenberghe, L. P. S., & Soccol, C. R., 2019. Exploring the impacts of postharvest processing on the aroma formation of coffee bean A review. Food Chemistry, 272, 441–452. |
| [4] | Hall, R. D., Trevisan, F., & de Vos, R. C. H., 2022. Coffee berry and green bean chemistry – Opportunities for improving cup quality and crop circularity. Food Research International, 151, Article 110825. |
| [5] | Poltronieri, P., & Rossi, F., 2016. Challenges in specialty coffee processing and quality assurance. Challenges, 7, 19. |
| [6] | Junior, D. B., Guarçoni, R. C., da Silva, M. D. C. S., Veloso, T. G. R., Kasuya, M. C. M., Oliveira, E. C. D. S. Pereira, L. L., 2021. Microbial fermentation affects sensorial, chemical, and microbial profile of coffee under carbonic maceration. Food Chemistry, 342, Article 128296. |
| [7] | Martins, P. M. M., Batista, N. N., Miguel, M. G. d. C. P., Sim˜ao, J. B. P., Soares, J. R., &Schwan, R. F., 2020. Coffee growing altitude influences the microbiota, chemical compounds and the quality of fermented coffees. Food Research International, 129, Article 108872. |
| [8] | Pereira, T. S., Batista, N. N., Santos Pimenta, L. P., Martinez, S. J., Ribeiro, L. S., Oliveira Naves, J. A., & Schwan, R. F., 2022. Self-induced anaerobiosis coffee fermentation: Impact on microbial communities, chemical composition and sensory quality of coffee. Food Microbiology, 103, Article 103962. |
| [9] | Raveendran, A., Murthy, P. S., 2021. New trends in specialty coffees “the digested coffees”. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. |
| [10] | Febrianto Ariefandie and Fan Zhu, 2023. Coffee bean processing: Emerging methods and their effects on chemical, biological and sensory properties; Food Chemistry 412 (2023) 135489. |
| [11] |
Kinette Sumadia, 2021. 4 Poop Coffees from Around the World Would You Dare;
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/4-poop-coffees-from-around-world-would-you-dare-kinette-joy-sumadia/ |
| [12] |
Kaushik Patowary, 2010. The Most Expensive Coffee in The World is Made From Animal Poop;
https://www.amusingplanet.com/2010/08/most-expensive-coffee-in-world-is-made.html |
| [13] |
CBH Coffee Pulse, 2024. Evolution of coffee bean processing
https://coffeebeanhours.com/evolution-of-coffee-bean-processing/ |
| [14] | Trianon Coffee, 2024. |
| [15] | Sinouk Coffee, 2024. |
| [16] | da Mota, M. C. B., Batista, N. N., Rabelo, M. H. S., Ribeiro, D. E., Bor´em, F. M., & Schwan, R. F., 2020. Influence of fermentation conditions on the sensorial quality of coffee inoculated with yeast. Food Research International, 136, Article 109482. |
| [17] | Martinez, S. J., Rabelo, M. H. S., Bressani, A. P. P., Da Mota, M. C. B., Bor´em, F. M., & Schwan, R. F., 2021. Emerging stainless-steel tanks enhances coffee fermentation quality. Food Research International, 139, Article 109921. |
| [18] | Huang, W.-C., & Tang, I.-C., 2007. Bacterial and yeast cultures – process characteristics, products, and applications. In Yang, S.-T. (Ed.). Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources - New Technologies and Applications. Elsevier. |
| [19] | Ga¨nzle, M. G., 2015. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2, 106–117. |
| [20] |
Ismayadi, C., Marsh, A., & Clarke, R., 2005. Influence of storage of wet Arabica parchment prior to wet hulling on moulds development, ochratoxin A contamination, and cup quality of Mandheling coffee. Pelita Perkebunan, 21, 131–146.
https://doi.org/10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v21i2.20 |
| [21] | Maman, M., Sangchote, S., Piasai, O., Leesutthiphonchai, W., Sukorini, H., & Khewkhom, N., 2021. Storage fungi and ochratoxin A associated with arabica coffee bean in postharvest processes in Northern Thailand. Food Control, 130, Article 108351. |
| [22] | Sulaiman, I., Erfiza, N. M., & Moulana, R., 2021. Effect of fermentation media on the quality of Arabica wine coffee. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 709, Article 012027. |
| [23] | Febrina, L., Happyana, N., & Syah, Y. M., 2021. Metabolite profiles and antidiabetic activity of the green bean of Luwak (civet) coffees. Food Chemistry, 355, Article 129496. |
| [24] | Lee, L. W., Cheong, M. W., Curran, P., Yu, B., & Liu, S. Q., 2016a. Modulation of coffee aroma via the fermentation of green coffee bean with Rhizopus oligosporus: I. Green coffee. Food Chemistry, 211, 916–924. |
| [25] | Murthy, P. S., Sneha, H. P., Basavaraj, K., & Kusumoto, K.-I., 2019. Modulation of coffee flavor precursors by Aspergillus oryzae serine carboxypeptidases. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 113, Article 108312. |
| [26] | Larassati, D. P., Kustyawati, M. E., Subekti, Sartika, D., & Suharyono, A. S., 2021. Effect of wet fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae on chemical properties and sensory of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora). Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 10, 449–458. |
| [27] |
Balance coffee, 2024. What Is Kopi Luwak? Asian Civet Cat Poop Coffee Guide;
https://balancecoffee.co.uk/blogs/blog/what-is-kopi-luwak-asian-civet-cat-poop-coffee |
| [28] | Pure Kopi Luwak, 2024. Animal Poop Coffee, |
| [29] |
Chandra Melo, 2022. Coffee Beans From Poop;
https://www.eraofwe.com/coffee-lab/en/articles/coffee-beans-from-poop |
| [30] | Jumhawan, U., Putri, S. P., Yusianto, Bamba, T., & Fukusaki, E., 2015. Application of gas chromatography/flame ionization detector-based metabolite fingerprinting for authentication of Asian palm civet coffee (kopi Luwak). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 120, 555–561. |
| [31] | Thammarat, P., Kulsing, C., Wongravee, K., Leepipatpiboon, N., & Nhujak, T., 2018. Identification of volatile compounds and selection of discriminant markers for elephant dung coffee using static headspace gas chromatography mass spectrometry and chemometrics. Molecules, 23, 1910. |
| [32] | Lee, L. W., Cheong, M. W., Curran, P., Yu, B., & Liu, S. Q., 2016b. Modulation of coffee aroma via the fermentation of green coffee bean with Rhizopus oligosporus: II. Effects of different roast levels. Food Chemistry, 211, 925–936. |
APA Style
Shehasen, M. Z. (2024). Evolving Processing Methods Effect on Quality in Coffee Production; Cases of Animal Poop Coffee; Review. Science Research, 12(6), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12
ACS Style
Shehasen, M. Z. Evolving Processing Methods Effect on Quality in Coffee Production; Cases of Animal Poop Coffee; Review. Sci. Res. 2024, 12(6), 126-134. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12
AMA Style
Shehasen MZ. Evolving Processing Methods Effect on Quality in Coffee Production; Cases of Animal Poop Coffee; Review. Sci Res. 2024;12(6):126-134. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12,
author = {Mohammedsani Zakir Shehasen},
title = {Evolving Processing Methods Effect on Quality in Coffee Production; Cases of Animal Poop Coffee; Review
},
journal = {Science Research},
volume = {12},
number = {6},
pages = {126-134},
doi = {10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sr.20241206.12},
abstract = {This paper explores the intricate dynamics and evolving methodologies surrounding coffee bean and beverage quality, which are crucial determinants of market pricing. The quality of coffee is shaped by an intricate interplay of genetic, environmental, postharvest processing factors, which collectively account for up to 60% of its final quality. Postharvest processing methods including traditional and contemporary approaches like honey processing, anaerobic fermentation, and digestion methods or animal poop that involving animal interactions exhibit diverse impacts on the aromatic profile and sensory attributes of coffee. Among the most intriguing innovations are methods involving animal assistance, notably the production of Kopi Luwak, Black Ivory coffee, and other animal derived coffee variants, which leverage the unique fermentation processes occurring within the digestive tracts of animals such as civets, elephants, monkeys, bats, birds and Coati. The fermentation of beans in these novel methods influences not only the flavor and aroma but also raises ethical and sustainability concerns related to animal welfare. This review synthesizes recent findings on the impact of various processing techniques on coffee quality, highlights the potential for enhancing sensory characteristics through evolving methods, and underscores the importance of ethical sourcing practices in the face of consumer demand for unique, high-quality coffee. By advancing understanding in these areas, the paper aims to contribute to the continued innovation and improvement in coffee processing, with a focus on balancing quality, sustainability, and ethical considerations.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evolving Processing Methods Effect on Quality in Coffee Production; Cases of Animal Poop Coffee; Review AU - Mohammedsani Zakir Shehasen Y1 - 2024/11/22 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12 T2 - Science Research JF - Science Research JO - Science Research SP - 126 EP - 134 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0927 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20241206.12 AB - This paper explores the intricate dynamics and evolving methodologies surrounding coffee bean and beverage quality, which are crucial determinants of market pricing. The quality of coffee is shaped by an intricate interplay of genetic, environmental, postharvest processing factors, which collectively account for up to 60% of its final quality. Postharvest processing methods including traditional and contemporary approaches like honey processing, anaerobic fermentation, and digestion methods or animal poop that involving animal interactions exhibit diverse impacts on the aromatic profile and sensory attributes of coffee. Among the most intriguing innovations are methods involving animal assistance, notably the production of Kopi Luwak, Black Ivory coffee, and other animal derived coffee variants, which leverage the unique fermentation processes occurring within the digestive tracts of animals such as civets, elephants, monkeys, bats, birds and Coati. The fermentation of beans in these novel methods influences not only the flavor and aroma but also raises ethical and sustainability concerns related to animal welfare. This review synthesizes recent findings on the impact of various processing techniques on coffee quality, highlights the potential for enhancing sensory characteristics through evolving methods, and underscores the importance of ethical sourcing practices in the face of consumer demand for unique, high-quality coffee. By advancing understanding in these areas, the paper aims to contribute to the continued innovation and improvement in coffee processing, with a focus on balancing quality, sustainability, and ethical considerations. VL - 12 IS - 6 ER -
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
Information