Information on food composition is of great importance for scientists and professionals working in the fields of nutrition and public health. The most apparent role of food composition is to provide the basis for dietary assessment and the formulation of healthier diets. Ready meals and food served in canteens are increasingly included in this approach considering their contribution to daily nutrition. There have been no studies that presented the nutritional values of some traditional Syrian sweets. This study was the first study to shed some lights about the nutritional facts of the traditional Syrian sweets. Seventeen different traditional Syrian sweets both regular calorie content (regular where sucrose was used as sweetener) and reduced calorie content (diet as Aspartame sweetener was used) were analyzed for Moisture, Ash, Carbohydrates, Protein and Fat content and finally calorie density per 100 g was calculated. The study also measured the calorie content of few sweets which we did not find diet ones similar to them. The results have shown that Syrian sweets in general are very calorie dense foods due to their high content of sugar, fat and other sweeteners such as honey and (high fructose corn Syrup (HFCS). The calorie density ranges from 347.5 Kcal to 516.2 Kcal/ 100 g serving for diet sweets and 372.8 Kcal to 532.2 Kcal/100 g serving for regular sweets. Protein ranged from 5.6 g to 18.4 g and fat from 5.5 to 29.8 g/100 g serving.
Published in | World Journal of Food Science and Technology (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11 |
Page(s) | 40-47 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Syrian Sweets, CHO, Protein, Fat, Baklavah, Mamoul, Kunafeh, Barazek
[1] | Greenfield, H. and Southgate, D. A. T. (2003) Food Composition Data 2nd Edition: Production, Management and Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, FAO, Rome. |
[2] | Nielsen, S. S. (2003). Food analysis. Third Edition, Springer, USA. |
[3] | Rameen Devi.; Sch J Agric Vet Sci., Aug-Sep 2015; 2 (4A): 304-311. |
[4] | Livingstone MB, Rennie KL. Added sugars and micronutrient dilution. Obes Rev. 2009 Mar; 10 Suppl 1: 34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00563.x. |
[5] | Matthew, A. F (2009). Energy content in a candy bar. Cal Poly University's Journal. 1132: 23-31. |
[6] | Lobstein T1, Davies S. Defining and labelling 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' food. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Mar; 12 (3): 331-40. |
[7] | Grunert and Wills, 2007. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labelsJournal of Public Health volume 15, Issue 5, pp 385–399. |
[8] | Pietinen P, Paturi M, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Valsta LM. FINDIET 2007 Survey: energy and nutrient intakes. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun; 13 (6A): 920-4. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001102. |
[9] | Variyam JN. Do nutrition labels improve dietary outcomes? Health Econ. 2008 Jun; 17 (6): 695-708. |
[10] | Meirelles, A. and Handwerk, R. (2009). Dietary Fructose and Glucose Differentially Affect Lipid. The Journal of Nutrition 139: 1257S-1262S. |
[11] | Zimmerman TP, Hull SG, McNutt S, et al. Challenges in converting an interviewer-administered food probe database to self-administration in the National Cancer Institute Automated Self-administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24). J Food Compost Anal. 2009; 22 (Supplement 1): S48–S51. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2009.02.003. |
[12] | Tanu J, KGrove. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research. Vol. 5; Issue: 5; May 2015. |
[13] | Vincenzo, Fogliano. Giuseppe, Maiani and Giovanni, Quaglia. Seasonal variations in antioxidant components of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Naomi F1) Journal of Food Composition and Analysis Volume 19, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 11-19. |
[14] | Jakszyn P, et al. Development of a food database of nitrosamines, heterocyclic amines, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Nutr. 2004. |
[15] | Birlouez-Aragon I, Saavedra G, Tessier FJ, Galinier A, Ait-Ameur L, Lacoste F, Niamba CN, Alt N, Somoza V, Lecerf JM A diet based on high-heat-treated foods promotes risk factors for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May; 91 (5): 1220-6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28737. Epub 2010 Mar 24. |
[16] | Merchant AT1, Dehghan M. Food composition database development for between country comparisons. Nutr J. 2006 Jan 19; 5: 2. |
[17] | Grenby, T. H. (1991). Intense sweeteners for the food industry. An overview. Trends in food Sci. and Tech. 2 (1): 2-6. |
[18] | Branen, A. L.; Davidson, P. M. and Saminene, G. (1990). Food Additives, Sweeteners. Marcel Dekker, INC, N. Y. and Basel, Chapter 8, 297-323. |
[19] | Giese, J. H. (1993). Alternative sweeteners and bulking agents. Food Technology. 47 (1): 114-126. |
[20] | Franta, R. and Beck, B. (1986). Sweeteners. Alternative to cane and beet sugar. J. Food Techno., 40 (1): 116-128. |
[21] | Lecos, C. W. (1985). Sweetness minus calories- controversy. FDA Consumer, 19 (2): 18. |
[22] | A. O. A. C. (2002). "Official Methods of Analysis", 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc. USA. |
APA Style
Louay Labban, Nasser Thallaj, Mohammad Al Masri. (2019). The Nutritional Value of Traditional Syrian Sweets and Their Calorie Density. World Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3(4), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11
ACS Style
Louay Labban; Nasser Thallaj; Mohammad Al Masri. The Nutritional Value of Traditional Syrian Sweets and Their Calorie Density. World J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 3(4), 40-47. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11
AMA Style
Louay Labban, Nasser Thallaj, Mohammad Al Masri. The Nutritional Value of Traditional Syrian Sweets and Their Calorie Density. World J Food Sci Technol. 2019;3(4):40-47. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11
@article{10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11, author = {Louay Labban and Nasser Thallaj and Mohammad Al Masri}, title = {The Nutritional Value of Traditional Syrian Sweets and Their Calorie Density}, journal = {World Journal of Food Science and Technology}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {40-47}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjfst.20190304.11}, abstract = {Information on food composition is of great importance for scientists and professionals working in the fields of nutrition and public health. The most apparent role of food composition is to provide the basis for dietary assessment and the formulation of healthier diets. Ready meals and food served in canteens are increasingly included in this approach considering their contribution to daily nutrition. There have been no studies that presented the nutritional values of some traditional Syrian sweets. This study was the first study to shed some lights about the nutritional facts of the traditional Syrian sweets. Seventeen different traditional Syrian sweets both regular calorie content (regular where sucrose was used as sweetener) and reduced calorie content (diet as Aspartame sweetener was used) were analyzed for Moisture, Ash, Carbohydrates, Protein and Fat content and finally calorie density per 100 g was calculated. The study also measured the calorie content of few sweets which we did not find diet ones similar to them. The results have shown that Syrian sweets in general are very calorie dense foods due to their high content of sugar, fat and other sweeteners such as honey and (high fructose corn Syrup (HFCS). The calorie density ranges from 347.5 Kcal to 516.2 Kcal/ 100 g serving for diet sweets and 372.8 Kcal to 532.2 Kcal/100 g serving for regular sweets. Protein ranged from 5.6 g to 18.4 g and fat from 5.5 to 29.8 g/100 g serving.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Nutritional Value of Traditional Syrian Sweets and Their Calorie Density AU - Louay Labban AU - Nasser Thallaj AU - Mohammad Al Masri Y1 - 2019/12/24 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11 DO - 10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11 T2 - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Food Science and Technology SP - 40 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6024 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20190304.11 AB - Information on food composition is of great importance for scientists and professionals working in the fields of nutrition and public health. The most apparent role of food composition is to provide the basis for dietary assessment and the formulation of healthier diets. Ready meals and food served in canteens are increasingly included in this approach considering their contribution to daily nutrition. There have been no studies that presented the nutritional values of some traditional Syrian sweets. This study was the first study to shed some lights about the nutritional facts of the traditional Syrian sweets. Seventeen different traditional Syrian sweets both regular calorie content (regular where sucrose was used as sweetener) and reduced calorie content (diet as Aspartame sweetener was used) were analyzed for Moisture, Ash, Carbohydrates, Protein and Fat content and finally calorie density per 100 g was calculated. The study also measured the calorie content of few sweets which we did not find diet ones similar to them. The results have shown that Syrian sweets in general are very calorie dense foods due to their high content of sugar, fat and other sweeteners such as honey and (high fructose corn Syrup (HFCS). The calorie density ranges from 347.5 Kcal to 516.2 Kcal/ 100 g serving for diet sweets and 372.8 Kcal to 532.2 Kcal/100 g serving for regular sweets. Protein ranged from 5.6 g to 18.4 g and fat from 5.5 to 29.8 g/100 g serving. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -